A Nation Disunited in Divisive Dysfunction

"[H]alf of registered voters say the economy and health care are extremely important to their vote, and 47 percent say the same thing about Iran."

"Roughly four in ten rate income and wealth distribution (44 percent), gas prices (42 percent), immigration (40 percent) and abortion (38 percent) as extremely important." 

Gallup poll

 

"The ongoing development of the Democratic Party as a party not of labour but of socioeconomic elites, and the ongoing development of the Republican Party as a party not of business but of working class social conservatives represents a major, perhaps the major American political development of the 21st century."

Eitan Hersh, Tufts University, Sarang Shah, University of California-Berkley 

"I think we're going to do great -- but if we didn't win, I veto everything."

"I'll be vetoing, vetoing. And then they'll come along and we'll probably make some deals along the way."

"[Democrats are] extreme and dangerous radicals [who will] steal your wealth [and let in migrants to] ransack, rape and plunder." 

U.S. President Donald J. Trump 

Democratic and Republican observers review ballots during midterm elections at the Fulton County Election Hub and Operation Center in Fairburn, Georgia, US, November 3, 2026. REUTERS/Edgar Su

 

Polls in the United States indicate that Democrats are poised to seize the House of Representatives and if that were not enough, they're within reach of he Senate, with today's vote representing President Trump's waking nightmare. A record 54 million Americans chose to cast their ballots early. A number of citizens so anxious to have their say that it surely bodes ill for the current administration in the White House. 

 

A truly divided nation, caught between an incumbent whose impulsive decision-making has made life an suspense of mercurial decision-making, an economic straitjacket, as opposed to a competing aspirant to the White House whose previous administration was no beacon of light before being ousted and is now flirting with deep-left socialism brought to the fore by the Democratic Socialists of America, arguably the Democrats' latest flirtation with a system of governance foreign to the U.S.

 

This midterm election is the most tense of any in living memory; the U.S. two-party-rule of Republican and Democrat where each now sits firmly on the fulcrum of extremism, worrying to an electorate in the middle, in a fierce battle for dominion. Neither party is exceptionally a firm choice by Americans, their loyalties have been burdened by the fundamentalist hardening of attitudes on either side. The situation is one of distaste for both parties, a desire to rid the White House of the current office holder whose abuse of office has aroused fed-up anger, while at the same time knowing the alternative is likely no improvement.

 

U.S. President Donald Trump, pictured in Washington, D.C. The U.S. midterms happen on Tuesday, Nov. 3, when all 435 members of the House and 35 of the 100 Senate seats are up for election. As well, there will be state-level elections. The U.S. midterms are seen as a referendum on Trump's leadership and will determine who takes control of Congress.Photograph courtesy of the White House/Daniel Torok

 

For the past several decades U.S. elections have been based on a kind of musical chair performance, where an incumbent government has grown stale long before its administrative time has elapsed, leading voters to welcome the alternate party, an exchange that has become predictably routine as neither party has been willing to embrace the moderation of inclusive governance in preference to fiercely promoting their ideological positions as immutable, the scaffold on which their administration bases all their legislative decision-making.

 

The only enthusiasm most of the voting public displays now is to vote to rid themselves of the current office holders and hold their collective breath in the hope that the opposite player will hold off for a tolerable period from promoting and acting on decisions that echo those they replaced in reverse-mode: party-first, national interests trundling along behind. Sending the Republicans a stout message that the governing style of an egocentric, mercurial, personal-profit-oriented president is not to be repeated by either party.  

 

The mild socialism that the Democratic party has developed has devolved from its moderate view of a regulated capitalist economy, with the state involving itself in welfare issues and supporting tolerant social mores is now represented at the common level with underemployed urban socialists finding dissatisfaction with their opportunities and unmet aspirations, whose resentments have found solace in the uptake of discovering the source of world conflict and economic downturns through antisemitism.

 

Still from video   Global News

 

"[T]oo many Democrats are noticeably and shamefully silent with antisemitism comes from the far left", observed Democratic New Jersey member of Congress Josh Gottheimer. In the same token a rise of bigotry has arisen on the far-right membership-flank of the Republicans, deplored by GOP Texas Senator Ted Cruz. Republicans have also embraced a steep level of trade protectionism, a favourite whipping-target of their president who initiated a wholesale tariff war on enemies and allies alike as soon as he resumed office.

 

Can getting out the vote on this critical shape-shifting dual-role, intermittently exchanged style of government drive a new, more internally and globally appreciated direction for a nation whose wealth and power have monumental international influence, and repair both the internal hostility engendered by the parties' divisions and derision-propelled opponent-status, and the confusion abroad caused by a president who has spoken of foreign allies and global democratic institutions in the most derogatory of terms? 

 

Still from video   Global News