How Much Is a Supernova Worth?
SLATE
Posted
Thursday, March 21, 2013, at 8:00 AM
If I had a nickel for every nickel you could make from the nickel in supernova SN1999em, I’d be very, very, VERY rich.
If I were you, dear BABloggee, I’d be thinking, “What the what?”
So let me explain. Well, let me explain in a minute. First, I want to
introduce you to the gorgeous but somewhat lopsided spiral galaxy NGC
1637, care of the Very Large Telescope in Chile:
Very Large Telescope image of the spiral galaxy NGC 1637. Click to galactinate.
Image credit: ESO
Image credit: ESO
NGC 1637 is a decent-size spiral galaxy about 26 million light years
away. That’s pretty close for a galaxy, roughly equivalent to being down
the block in our galactic neighborhood. As you can see, it’s noticeably
asymmetric—lopsided—with the arm to the upper left a lot longer than
its counterpart on the other side. This kind of thing is fairly common, occurring in about a third of all spiral galaxies.
It’s even more common when the galaxy is part of a cluster of galaxies,
so it’s probably due to gravitational interactions with other galaxies
as they pass close by.
The image here is a combination of many pictures taken over quite
some time starting in 1999. Why then? Because an exploding star was
discovered in late October of that year, given the designation SN1999em
(the 143rd such exploding star to be discovered that year*).
Because the galaxy is fairly close, this explosion got bright enough to
be seen even with small telescopes, and it became one of the best
observed supernovae of its day.
Supernova 1999em is marked in this image taken with a 50 cm (20") telescope.
Image credit: Kopernik Astro Society
Image credit: Kopernik Astro Society
The Very Large Telescope was used to observe it many times, getting
great shots of the host galaxy NGC 1637 as well as important
observations of the supernova. The star was probably about eight times
the mass of the Sun when it went kablooie. Stars like that create a lot
of heavy elements in their core: oxygen, carbon, silicon, and nickel, to
name a few. When the star explodes, a lot of energy is generated, and those materials are scattered at very
high speed. Not only that, new elements are created in the blast as the
nuclei of these elements get slammed by subatomic particles from the
blast.
One of these elements is nickel (“AHA!” I hear you thinking,
“Finally!”). The kind of nickel made specifically is nickel-56, usually
written 56Ni. It’s radioactive, and decays into cobalt-56
which in turn decays into iron-56. Do you see any iron materials around
you? Maybe steel in your desk, or in the girders in your house or
building. Or maybe you’re bleeding. If you are, go take care of that,
but as you do so note that your blood is red due to the molecule
hemoglobin, which transports oxygen in your body to where you need it.
Hemoglobin is a complicated molecule, but at its center is—you guessed
it—iron. That iron was almost certainly produced in some ancient
exploding star billions of years ago.
But back to nickel. How much was blown out in SN1999em, specifically? It turns out the total nickel in the supernova was about 0.02 times the mass of the Sun. The Sun has a mass of 2 x 1027 tons, so the mass of nickel created in the supernova was 4 x 1025
tons. So, yeah, a lot of nickel. If you could gather up all that nickel
you could make a planet the size of Jupiter, a thousand times the
volume of the Earth. A pure nickel planet. Cool.
A Chandra X-Ray Observatory image of NGC 1637, taken 49 days after
the supernova (marked by the arrow). The bright white dot to the left of
the galaxy’s center is probably a young black hole gobbling down matter
and spewing out X-rays.
Image credit: NASA/CXC/Penn State/S. Immler et al.
So, to coin a phrase: We are star stuff.
But how much money is that in actual nickels? A U.S. nickel has a mass of five grams. But we have to be careful: only ¼ of the mass of a nickel is actually
nickel; the other ¾ is copper. So let’s assume we have an infinite
supply of copper somewhere to add to our stash of nickel nickels, and we
only need 1.25 grams of nickel per nickel.
The supernova expelled 4 x 1031 grams of nickel, which would make 3.2 x 1031
nickels. As I mentioned, that’s a lot. If you stacked them (given their
thickness of 1.95 mm) they’d stretch clear across the Universe…dozens of times. I had to check my math several times for that because I simply couldn’t believe it. It’s insane.
And how much money is that?
It would be the tidy sum of $1.6 x 1030, or 1.6 million trillion trillion dollars.
1,600,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 dollars. Huh.
With that much money you could pay off the entire U.S. national debt
100 quadrillion times, and still have enough spare change to get a few
billion cups of coffee. With extra cream. Even at Starbucks.
Sounds like a great get-rich plan! The only trouble is the nickel
from a supernova is a) at a temperature of thousands of degrees, 2)
spread out over several cubic light years of space, γ) expanding at several thousand kilometers per second, and iv) remember, highly
radioactive, releasing enough energy to power the glow of the supernova
for several weeks. Also, in this particular case, it’s located 26
million light years away, so there may prohibitively high transportation
costs.
Ah well. I never really planned on getting rich from astronomy. It’s
actually payment enough having so much fun figuring this stuff out.
[Note to my editor: It’s not actually payment enough. Please pay me. Just not with nickels.]
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home