Galaxies Are Weird and Weirdly Beautiful
SLATE
Posted
Monday, May 20, 2013, at 11:51 AM
Galaxies, on the whole, are very pretty. I find that interesting,
actually; we didn’t evolve to see galaxies with our naked eyes, and they
exert no selective pressure on us to breed, so when we find them so
attractive it must be coincidence. Their shape, color, and structure
just so happen to fit our definition of beauty. Appreciating the art of
the Universe is a collateral benefit of evolution.
And then there’s this galaxy, prosaically named J125013.50+073441.5
(after its coordinates on the sky). I have to admit I’m admiring its
strange appeal.
The strange and lovely wreckage of a cosmic collision. Click to galactinate.
Photo by ESA/Hubble & NASA, M. Hayes
Photo by ESA/Hubble & NASA, M. Hayes
What an odd thing! It's located about 500 million light years away,
and has clearly suffered a massive collision—while it does have spiral
arms, the overall structure is a mess, indicating some large disturbance
happened not too long ago. Most likely another galaxy came along, and
the mutual gravity of the two drew them together, creating chaos in
their structures. There’s no other nearby galaxy in the image, so I
suspect the two wound up merging, and we’re catching it a few hundred
million years after the event. The ring in the center and the small
straight spurs around it are relatively common features seen in the
aftermath of collisions as well, formed by the gravitational interaction
of one galaxy as it plunges into another.
The image, taken using Hubble Space Telescope,
is rather unusual, spanning a wide range of wavelengths of light. It’s a
composite of three observations, one in the ultraviolet (shown as blue
in the image), one in visible light which accentuates normal starlight
(shown as green), and near-infrared which highlights dust (red).
Ultraviolet light is emitted by young, massive, hot stars (and the
gas surrounding them, lit by the intense radiation), and those tend to
be born in spiral arms. That’s why the arms look blue. There's so much
ultraviolet light being emitted, so much star formation going on, that
J1250 is labeled a "starburst galaxy"—again, that tends to be an effect
of galaxy collisions, when massive clouds of gas slam into each other,
collapse, and furiously form stars. The dust is all over the place, and
really does look like it was stirred up by the collision. Dust is
actually made of complex organic (carbon chain) molecules, created when
stars are born and when they die.
The galaxy J082354.96—"Cinderella's Slipper"—which is also a part of the LARS observations.
Photo by ESA/Hubble & NASA, M. Hayes
Photo by ESA/Hubble & NASA, M. Hayes
In the Hubble release for this image, they mention this galaxy was observed as part of the Lyman Alpha Reference Sample research; a survey to look at galaxies that emit a lot of a special kind of ultraviolet light called Lyman Alpha. As it happens, I wrote about this survey recently when Hubble released a spectacular image of another targeted galaxy, which I think should be called Cinderella’s Slipper.
The survey is helping astronomers understand galaxy formation and
evolution by looking at nearby galaxies that can be used as models for
far more distant ones. Closer ones are easier to study, while more
distant ones may appear only as dots. The closer ones allow us to
separate out various features (like the center of the galaxy versus an
extended halo of gas) that are unresolved in the more distant galaxies.
It’s a clever idea, and very useful for understanding what galaxies were
like when the Universe was much younger.
And it does provide us with a bit of eye candy along with that
nutritional brain fodder, too. I’m not an evolutionary biologist, so I’m
no expert in the whys and wherefores of our appreciation of the beauty
of the Universe. But I do know what looks lovely to me, and I also know
that the science behind that beauty adds to it, giving it depth and
personality. Art is always supplemented by the knowledge of how it came
to be…especially when it’s on a grand a scale as the cosmos itself.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home