The Willing Dupe Wails Justice!
Apart from the true misfortune of having been disfavoured by chance, nature and genetic inheritance, the case of the mature, intelligent, but dreadfully emotionally needy Doug Macklem is a lesson in submission to delusionary willfulness. The court case which found a former call-girl guilty of deliberately defrauding the man of $850,000 also outlined his own culpability in his misfortune.
The simple fact being that he sought out her company, knowing that she sold her favours to those who would pay the freight. How could anyone possibly come to the conclusion that a woman in the profession of selling her body would be interested in giving away what was highly priced without a price tag? His need to believe otherwise was what compelled him to assume she would become his female companion.
He is wheel-chair-bound, very obviously physically incapacitated, with an active mind and an obvious emotional yearning to be normal in his relationships with the opposite sex. It would take an extraordinary woman to view a man so severely physically handicapped as representing someone with whom she would enjoy a future. Particularly would it be extraordinary for a woman who views her body as a financing tool, to take that plunge.
It was he who made all the advances, enraptured by his accessibility to her body through the simple expedient of paying for it. This was a business transaction, nothing less, nothing more. Many women would recoil from having sex with a man whose physical limitations reflected this man's. Many men would recoil from having paid intimate relations. That she did not hesitate to fulfill his physical needs emphasized her willingness to perform if the price is high enough.
Where might this man have plucked the notion that would lead him to leap to the conclusion that a woman who unabashedly demands money for sex would represent a loving partner, emotionally invested in his well-being? That she bled him for money, demanding huge sums for various entitlements should have been a glaring clue to her sensibilities, but his sensitivities were lodged in his groin, not his brain.
He has now succeeded in what he can consider his pursuit of justice. Calling upon the law to rescue him from his own unspeakable folly. He claims that the woman robbed him of his dignity, but such cannot possibly be the case; he surrendered it willingly.
The simple fact being that he sought out her company, knowing that she sold her favours to those who would pay the freight. How could anyone possibly come to the conclusion that a woman in the profession of selling her body would be interested in giving away what was highly priced without a price tag? His need to believe otherwise was what compelled him to assume she would become his female companion.
He is wheel-chair-bound, very obviously physically incapacitated, with an active mind and an obvious emotional yearning to be normal in his relationships with the opposite sex. It would take an extraordinary woman to view a man so severely physically handicapped as representing someone with whom she would enjoy a future. Particularly would it be extraordinary for a woman who views her body as a financing tool, to take that plunge.
It was he who made all the advances, enraptured by his accessibility to her body through the simple expedient of paying for it. This was a business transaction, nothing less, nothing more. Many women would recoil from having sex with a man whose physical limitations reflected this man's. Many men would recoil from having paid intimate relations. That she did not hesitate to fulfill his physical needs emphasized her willingness to perform if the price is high enough.
Where might this man have plucked the notion that would lead him to leap to the conclusion that a woman who unabashedly demands money for sex would represent a loving partner, emotionally invested in his well-being? That she bled him for money, demanding huge sums for various entitlements should have been a glaring clue to her sensibilities, but his sensitivities were lodged in his groin, not his brain.
He has now succeeded in what he can consider his pursuit of justice. Calling upon the law to rescue him from his own unspeakable folly. He claims that the woman robbed him of his dignity, but such cannot possibly be the case; he surrendered it willingly.
Labels: Human Relations, Justice, Social-Cultural Deviations
posted by Pieface @ 12:01 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home