Ruminations

Blog dedicated primarily to randomly selected news items; comments reflecting personal perceptions

Friday, December 09, 2022

The Vaccine=Disaffected

"[The baby's parents believed there were] spike proteins in the blood of people who have been vaccinated and that these proteins were causing unexpected deaths relating to transfusions. In Baby W''s best interests [the court will take temporary custody."
Judgement, Justice Ian Gault
 
"[The New Zealand Health Service decisions are] always made with the best interests of the child in mind." 
"We acknowledge the decision made by the court, following our application in relation to the baby's surgery and recognize this is a difficult situation for all involved."
Dr. Mike Shepherd, Auckland's interim director of the New Zealand Health Service 
Anti-vax demonstrators supporting mother and father of a four-month-old baby that urgently needs a heart operation demonstrate outside the High Court in Auckland, New Zealand, Tuesday.
Anti-vax demonstrators support the mother and father of a 4-month-old baby outside the High Court in Auckland, New Zealand.   AP

The parents of a six-month-old baby boy, referred to as "Baby W" in court, have refused to allow doctors to operate on their child unless a needed blood transfusion could be guaranteed to come from an unvaccinated source. Cole Reeves, the baby's father, stated that he and the baby's mother, Samantha Savage, refused to permit their child to receive "any blood other than blood that did not contain the Pfizer vaccine, mRNA, the spike protein or any other associated contaminants".

They firmly believed that spike proteins circulating in the blood of those who had been inoculated with mRNA vaccines such as the Pfizer0BioNTech or Moderna vaccines were "causing unexpected deaths related to transfusions", conveying this information to health-care workers at Starship hospital in Auckland where their baby son is being treated.

Baby W was diagnosed with a congenital heart defect requiring surgery for him to survive the condition. He remains in urgent need of an operation, and "every day that the operation is delayed his heart is under strain", noted the court order, citing one of his doctors' explanations. The New Zealand High Court took official custody of the baby to circumvent the parents' demand, preventing doctors from performing the child's life-saving surgery.

Doctors at the hospital responded to the parents' demand explaining that making use of blood donated from outside normal channels was "impractical" for the situation. Performing the surgery without donated blood was "not an available option". An explanation that failed to satisfy the parents. And since the surgery's urgent nature to preserve the child's life was paramount despite the parents' ongoing objections, Judge Ian Gault ruled that "in Baby W's best interests" the court would take temporary custody of the baby until surgery took place.

Until the baby recovers from surgery and no later than the end of January, the child would remain under the court guardianship. The needed surgery is estimated to require 48 hours to bring to completion. Under the court ruling two doctors were appointed as Baby W's legal representatives to enable consent to surgery. The baby's parents were appointed for "all other purposes" as his legal representatives in the interim. 

The parents had been "distressed? on an earlier occasion in October when they discovered during a medical procedure that the child had received blood. In future, an alternative was requested by them, since they refused to have their child receive "any blood other than blood that did not contain the mRNA spikes"  
 
Late, the distressed parents appeared on Infowars, a podcast that notorious conspiracy theorist Alex Jones hosted. He was recently held liable in a court action for misinformation denying the 2012 mass murder at a Sandy Hook school in Newtown, Connecticut.
 
 

Labels: , , , ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

 
()() Follow @rheytah Tweet