Ruminations

Blog dedicated primarily to randomly selected news items; comments reflecting personal perceptions

Friday, January 23, 2026

Female Indigenous Victims of Male Violence

"[The IJB's findings reflect] important systemic problems [that impact the outcomes of cases involving female Indigenous victims]."
"If police don't see the life [of Indigenous girls and women] as being as important ... how does that affect how they collect the evidence that goes before the prosecutor? Or a prosecutor says, 'I'll take a guilty plea to manslaughter so we don't have to clog up the courts with three months' or two months' worth of  trial time."
"We Indigenous women, for the most part, live in the margins -- in the shadows. Our lives just simply aren't as valuable as other people's lives."
Lawyer Marion Buller, former judge, elder, Mistawasis Nehiyawak First Nation
https://amnesty.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/stolensisters-banner_2-1.jpg 
 
According to the Investigative Journalism Bureau [out of University of Toronto],  Indigenous women and girls are killed far more frequently than other women in Canada by their intimate partners, perpetrators of murder, yet they are all too frequently convicted of lesser offences than murderers of non-Indigenous women. In their research the IJB concluded that in virtually all instances of the deaths of Indigenous women, the victim was familiar with her killer. 
 
There were 1,329 identified cases where women and girls died under suspicious circumstances in Canada between the years 2019 and 2025. Of that total, 25 percent -- 340 victims -- were Indigenous. Of those, 46 percent concluded in court with a finding of manslaughter (lack of intent to kill); the most common outcome in Indigenous female homicides. The single most common outcome in the deaths of Indigenous females is deemed to be manslaughter with its lesser criminal penalties.
 
https://i0.wp.com/ijb.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/By-the-numbers-23-01-2026-09-57-10.png?w=1080&ssl=1
On the other hand, of the 384 court cases involving non-Indigenous victims 24 percent concluded with a verdict of manslaughter. Second-degree murder, the outcome in 137 or 36% of cases was the most common conclusion which carries a minimum sentence of ten years, while manslaughter comes with no minimum sentence in the absence of a firearm. 
 
"When you look systemically ... lives and their health and their safety are not valued as highly. It is something that should cause further inquiry", noted Michael Spratt, Ottawa criminal defence lawyer. Several unusual characteristics were revealed by the IJB analysis in the manner in which the Canadian justice system manages meting out justice in cases of Indigenous female deaths. First-degree murder which carries a mandatory life-sentence represents the most serious charge in the country's justice system. 
 
Yet a mere 25 percent of the accused in the deaths of Indigenous women and girls were charged with first-degree murder. In contrast, first-degree murder charges were laid in instances of non-Indigenous female victims, at the rate of 37 percent. Further, 64 percent of cases in the killing of an Indigenous woman conclude with a plea bargain, in comparison to 57 percent of non-Indigenous victims.
 
A plea bargain results in 64 percent of cases when an Indigenous woman is killed, in comparison to 57 percent with a non-Indigenous victim. Reasons? The Indigenous community is over-represented in the Canadian justice system, far exceeding their share of the population, both as victims and as perpetrators, affirms Statistics Canada. This over-representation has led to the justice system creating a special category for Indigenous offenders, one that takes into account their status as Indigenous people who have suffered discrimination, poverty, disproportionate lack of schooling and troubled childhoods. 
 
A Jordan principle is applied that takes all these issues into account, citing as well the circumstances of Residential Schools in operation for a century, where children were separated from their families to be taught a curriculum that deliberately sought to introduce students to the Western European way of life, muting their Indigenous roots, culture and language in favour of the children adapting to general life in Canada. Out of these schools came students who could aspire to higher education and life in the professions. At a cost of root self-identification.
 
The courts and the entire criminal justice system adjusted to treating Indigenous offenders more lightly than criminal cases involving non-Indigenous, and that extended to cases of  serious criminal offences like murder. "[Perpetrators] know they're not going to get anything (punishment for ill deeds). And the reason is that the justice institution has failed us", states Ann Maje Raider, executive director, Liard Aboriginal Women's Society, Yukon, responding to a perception of greater leniency around the deaths of Indigenous women exacerbating the problem.
 
IJB's database illustrates that almost all -- some 97 percent -- of female Indigenous victims were killed by someone they knew. Although the figure is 90 percent for non-Indigenous victims, their killers are treated to a harsher, more appropriate penalty for their crimes. Available histories of accused in Indigenous crimes revealed that 94 percent were red flagged for previous arrests and convictions, contact with child services or significant mental health problems.
 
Remote areas such as reserves see restraining orders ineffective in maintaining a separation between victim and perpetrator. As a result, Indigenous women and girls face unusual and difficult challenges to self-protection from violence. Access to resources and shelters is limited or non-existent. The risk of community response when women and girls speak up about their fears and the violent abuse they are exposed to risks alienation from a disapproving community.
 
Indigenous women speak up, complaining about their vulnerability and faulting a justice system that too often fails them. They can carry signs that read "Where Are My Sisters", as they did in 2023, during the International Day of Action Search the Landfills for missing and murdered Indigenous women, but there are no organized protests by these women placing the blame on their 'Brothers' from within the Aboriginal community who prey on them, nor do they campaign for the responsibility of their communities to protect them.
 
https://amnesty.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/cambra-harris-1-edited.png
Summer 2023: Winnipeg’s Cambria Harris addresses a rally calling for the Manitoba government to walk back its refusal to search two local landfills for the remains of her mother, Morgan Harris, and two other Indigenous women allegedly murdered by a serial killer. (Photo credit: Melissa Robinson)
  

Labels: , , , ,

Friday, August 22, 2025

Confront A Home Intruder -- But With Restraint...?

"Officers arrived on scene and learned that the resident of the apartment had woke up [sic] to find another male [intruder] inside his apartment."
"There was an altercation inside the apartment and the intruder received serious life-threatening injuries as a result of that altercation."
Kawartha Lakes Police Service
 
"You should be able to protect your family when someone's going in there to harm your family and your kids."
"You should use all resources you possibly can to protect your family."
"So this criminal that's wanted by the police breaks into this guy's house. This guy gives him a beating, and this guy gets charged, and the other guy gets charged, but -- something is broken." 
"I know if someone breaks into my house or someone else's, you're going to fight for your life. This guy has a weapon … you're going to use any force you can to protect your family." 
Ontario Premier Doug Ford
A Kawartha Lakes Police Service police cruiser in a parking lot in broad daylight
Police are facing criticism for charges laid against a man in Lindsay, Ont., after an alleged home intruder was injured in an altercation in his apartment. (Mike Crawley/CBC)
 
"What would be unreasonable is as you've got them subdued on the ground, already under control, continuously hitting them, or hurting them, or stabbing them."
"It's unclear if these two individuals were known to each other, that could play into it as well."
"There's a lot that we don't know." 
Former police officer Dan Jones, currently  chair, Justice Studies program, NorQuest College, Edmonton 
On Monday, Kawartha Lakes police responded to a home invasion call in Lindsay, Ontario. A man named as Michael Kyle Breen, 41, had entered the apartment of 44-year-old Jeremy David McDonald. Mr. McDonald confronted an armed interloper in his home. He reacted as anyone in such circumstances would; arming himself to meet his obligations to protect his family from someone who entered the sanctity of the family home during the night with obviously ill intentions. 
 
The Police Service found the intruder severely injured by the homeowner who had evidently used a knife to disarm and put the intention of the intruder out of contention. On Thursday when the police publicly identified both the homeowner and the intruder, court documents reflect the homeowner as having been charged with aggravated assault and assault with a weapon; that he "did endanger the life" of the man identified as the armed nighttime intruder.
 
A report of an altercation between two males in the early hours of Monday morning had drawn the police response. On their arrival police quickly assessed the intruder's physical condition as medically serious leading them to have the injured man transported to a local hospital, from where he was later airlifted to a hospital in Toronto. The homeowner was charged with aggravated assault, assault with a weapon, then released to appear on September 25 at the Ontario court of justice in Lindsay, Ontario.
 
As it happened, the intruder was a wanted man well before his illegal, armed entry to the homeowner's apartment. He was wanted for previously committed unrelated offences. For his latest offence, he had been charged with possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose, break-and-enter and theft, as well as mischief under $5,000 and failing to comply with probation. 
 
2adda81e3ccace831e2868b9fac058aa7e54b655ea5091049c98cc534b58a47e
Ontario Premier Doug Ford speaks to the media during a funding announcement in Hamilton, Ont., Wednesday, Aug. 20, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Carlos Osorio
 
When news media picked up the story it became an instant sensation; remarks condemning the police action in charging the homeowner roundly criticized, including statements from the Ontario premier judging the situation absurd. The response from the chief of the Kawartha Lakes police was to note "the negative commentary about the officers and their actions is unjust and inaccurate". The public, however, and other authorities and journalists in reacting to the situation, were aghast at charging the homeowner, with zero sympathy for the injured -- however severely -- intruder. 
"Under Canadian law, individuals have the right to defend themselves and their property."
"However, it is important to understand that these rights are not unlimited in Canada. The law requires that any defensive action be proportionate to the threat faced."
"This means that while homeowners do have the right to protect themselves and their property, the use of force must be reasonable given the circumstances."
 Kawartha Lakes Police Chief Kirk Robertson 
A man is facing assault charges after allegedly inflicting life-threatening injuries on an intruder at his home in Lindsay, Ont. The case has triggered questions about the limits of self-defence in Canadian law. Still from video, CBC News

Labels: , , , , ,

 
()() Follow @rheytah Tweet