Ruminations

Blog dedicated primarily to randomly selected news items; comments reflecting personal perceptions

Tuesday, January 20, 2026

Truckers Convoy ... Liberal Government Overreach

"We are therefore of the view [like the Federal Court] that, on the basis of the record, Cabinet could not reasonably come to the conclusion that existing provincial capacity and authority could not effectively address the situation."
"We are of the view that Cabinet did not have reasonable grounds to believe that a national emergency existed, taking into account the wording of the Act, its constitutional underpinning and the record that was before it at the time the decision was made."
Chief Justice de Montigny, Federal Court of Appeal
 
"This is an affirmation from the court that these are fundamental freedoms that Canadians have that were violated by the freezing of bank accounts, by the invocation of this act, by the banning of assemblies."
"We're thrilled with the decision, and we think the court got this right."
Christine Van Geyn, litigation director, Canadian Constitution Foundation
 
"To claim that the threshold for declaring a public order emergency ... could be lower than the threshold for using the surveillance powers ... under the CSIS Act would make little sense. If anything, it should be the reverse. [Emergency powers demand more justification, not less -- particularly when they authorize] a vast array of draconian powers without any prior authorization."
"When properly understood as requiring bodily harm, the evidence is quite simply lacking. As disturbing and disruptive as the blockades and protests could be, they fell well short of a threat to national security."
Federal Court of Appeal
https://smartcdn.gprod.postmedia.digital/ottawacitizen/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/0131-protest-13_90049928-w.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=564&type=webp&sig=mE5te9SqKiBd9vLzRV6Gjg
Protesters gathered around Parliament Hill and the downtown core for the Freedom Convoy protest, some making their way from various locations across Canada, Sunday January 30, 2022. Photo by Ashley Fraser /Postmedia
 
A ruling by the Federal Court in 2024 that the invocation of the Emergencies Act in 2022 as a federal government response to a convoy of truckers that drove from across Canada to Ottawa in a planned protest against the Liberal government's COVID lockdown procedures which required truckers to be masked at all times, mandating that immunization against COVID be an accepted protocol, struck this group as radical. In refusing to comply with the government's demands they risked losing their licenses to operate which drove them to mount their protest. 
 
The national capital police and the municipality itself reacted in a confused manner in response to complaints from people living within the vicinity where the truckers congregated for a month, complaining of restraints to their daily routines, difficulty in accessing markets, disruptions to work schedules and day-and-night noise from incessant blaring of truck horns. When judicial stop orders to the noise were brought to play, the truckers complied, but their ongoing presence became a major local irritant. They were, nonetheless, practising their right to free assembly and citizen protest.
 
https://smartcdn.gprod.postmedia.digital/ottawacitizen/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/otttruckersfeb7-24.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=564&type=webp&sig=w9ipzurCHTJfwUaZ2tt1Bg
Police patrol downtown Ottawa as a protest against COVID-19 public health measures enters its 11th day, with trucks and other vehicles blocking several streets on February 7, 2022. Photo by Tony Caldwell /Postmedia
 
The federal government under then-prime minister Justin Trudeau was less than enamoured at the crude and rude truckers' messages in their disdain and disregard for his and his Cabinet's decision making. Which led to the decision to evoke the past when Mr. Trudeau's father as prime minister well before him, brought in the War Measures Act during the October Crisis emergency in Quebec when the Quebec nationalist group Front de libération du Québec began placing explosives in mailboxes, then turned to kidnapping politicians. Because of the stringent nature of the Act it was replaced by the Emergencies Act.
 
However, in resorting to the Emergencies Act, the Trudeau Cabinet overstepped its authority. The provinces did not support its use, the first time such an act was invoked since that of the War Measures Act in 1970 when its invocation was supported by the provincial premiers in the face of a violently dangerous situation which led to the murder of a Quebec politician. Once the Act was in motion, police stepped in to do essentially what they had already initiated in bringing order to the city center. Towing companies which refused to tow any of the trucks of the convoy were then forced to do so. Bank accounts of people who had written cheques to help fund the protest had their bank accounts frozen. The federal government began a campaign of legal intimidation against the convoy organizers. 
 
It has taken three years for the courts to settle the case brought against the federal government by the Canadian Constitution Foundation and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association as well as a few individuals affected by the emergency measures, but the court in its wisdom accepted the CCF's position that the use of the Emergencies Act in this situation was unneeded and hugely overreactive. The court's judgment was unanimous, upholding the lower court's 2024 decision: the federal government cannot invoke emergency powers in a domestic protest.
 
https://smartcdn.gprod.postmedia.digital/ottawacitizen/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/HighwayRoadblock063.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=564&type=webp&sig=iBqUYjvgnPxkdTNchIF9ow
Trucks were coming and going at the Coutts border crossing in this protest file photo. Photo by Darren Makowichuk /POSTMEDIA NETWORK
 
The court pointed out that the federal Cabinet would have to believe Canada was facing a "threat to the security of Canada" before it would attempt to respond through the use of the Emergencies Act. In this instance, the government obviously felt that the truckers had no right to criticize and deride a decision impacting the entire population as overdone and an assault on individual liberties, where in Canada citizens have the right to express themselves freely, through the Charter of Rights and Freedoms which guarantee freedom of assembly and free speech. 
 
The Canadian Security Intelligence Service itself assessed that no threat to national security was involved. The emergency powers act was brought into play even before a requested alternative threat assessment had been completed. The protests in question were cleared within the Criminal Code, with the RCMP commissioner advising the government that existing powers had not been exhausted by police. 
 
"In a federation, provinces should be left to determine for themselves how best to deal with a critical situation, especially when it largely calls for the application of the Criminal Code by police forces." Should the situation not exceed capacity or provincial authority   The court noted that privacy of individuals was invaded based on "potentially unfounded, subjective beliefs", which violated the protection of the Charter against unreasonable search, and was unjustifiable. 
 
The Liberal government thought otherwise, and when the Federal Court issued its 2024 ruling that the government had erred in calling the Emergencies Act into play, they appealed that decision. Now the Federal Court of Appeal upheld the earlier Court ruling and in the process chastised the government for its decision-making. A federal government that went on to charge two of the convoy's organizers with criminal offences, putting them through years-long persecution in the courts.
 

'Freedom Convoy' leaders Tamara Lich, Chris Barber given conditional sentences. Found guilty of mischief, both will spend a year at home with limited freedom.

"There's a long history of courts in Canada and elsewhere in the common law world, being very deferential to politicians when they make decisions about emergency powers, and that can be very dangerous, and it's heartening to see the courts taking a rigorous approach and not just accepting what the executive says at face value."
"It requires governments, no matter how high in the apex of the country's government you sit, that you have to be able to justify your exercised authority in reasons that are convincing to the courts and ultimately to ordinary citizens."
Paul Daly, chair of administrative law and governance, faculty of law, University of Ottawa 

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, February 14, 2022

Do.As.I.Say

"We talked about the U.S.-based flooding of the 911 phone lines in Ottawa, the presence of U.S. citizens in the blockades and the impact of foreign money to fund this illegal activity."
"[Biden] expressed concern not just for the impacts right now, but the indication that there is international support from the United States and from elsewhere around the world for these protests."
"[On some funding platforms, the] number of U.S. donations are approaching 50 percent."
"Our police services are monitoring carefully, and watching and co-ordinating with partner agencies around the world."
"We see mobilization of some of the more challenging political elements in Canada and in the United States around support for these blockades that are hurting citizens."
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau

"Canada has absolutely ZERO jurisdiction over how we manage our funds here at GiveSendGo."
"All funds for EVERY campaign on GiveSendGo flow directly to the recipients of those campaigns, not least of which is the Freedom Convoy campaign."
U.S.Christian fundraising site GiveSendGo

"There's messages from donors saying their location is in the U.K., Israel, U.S., and it has been promoted by some quite high-profile American content creators as well."
"[The Institute for Strategic Dialogue hasn't collected any evidence, but it's] something that I would never rule out [that some of the Convoy donations are emanating from Russia]."
Tim Squirrell, head, communications and editorial, Institute for Strategic Dialogue, U.K.

"Each hour that these blockades continue does more serious damage to our economy and society."
"Manufacturers that depend on just-in=time delivery have been forced to cancel shifts for thousands of workers, shipments of livestock and of fresh produce face serious delays or waste that threaten food security,and deliveries of products that are greatly needed by Canadian families are being cancelled."
Canadian Chamber of Commerce
trucker convoy
Anti-mandate protesters children walk beside parked trucks near Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Sunday, February 13, 2022. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Frank Gunn

The Canadian Truckers Convoy that has dubbed itself the Freedom Convoy has reverberated globally. From New Zealand to the United Kingdom, the United States to Israel and points between, capital cities like Paris are now facing the threat of blockades by their national truckers groups, initially expressing sympathy for the Canadian Truckers, and expanding that to express their own outrage over the coronavirus mandates that have been visited on themselves nationally.
 
In Canada, Federal authority has been muted in response to the capital of the country being under the physical thrall of thousands of protesters, many driving large semi-trailers, the rigs being used as a coercive measure and menace, threatening to remain as long as it takes for the central government to revoke its COVID mandates. That demand was later substantially increased by another demanding the Liberal government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau resign.

This is the same federal government that has failed to resolve an issue that has grown to national proportions causing both social and economic dislocation. Other truckers, attempting to deliver time-sensitive loads across the border between Canad and the United states have been held up for as long as a week at some of the critical border crossings. The Ambassador Bridge in Windsor, to Detroit, which sees a quarter of all trade pass through between the two countries has finally been cleared of protesters but not yet cleared for traffic.

The Canadian government has excoriated the provincial Ontario government and the municipality of its capital city for not having dealt expeditiously with the protests that have upended people's lives for close to three weeks with trucks idling 24 hours a day,diesel fumes polluting the atmosphere, air horns blasting continuously, and protesters openly defying mask mandates while harassing and intimidating local residents who wear masks. Grocers have shut down because of unruly behaviour, hospitals have been unable to operate as normally.

But the federal government and the prime minister sit by, critical of everyone else, themselves having in the first place caused the protesters to dig in their heels, refusing to disperse. Justin Trudeau spoke insultingly disparagingly of the truckers, characterizing them as misfits, racists, homophobes, thugs with whom he refused to meet. When Black Lives Matter demonstrated on Parliament Hill a year and a half ago, Trudeau was pleased to make an appearance and 'take a knee', though many of the BLM demonstrations turned violent.

This is the same Trudeau that when India attempted to introduce new farm legislation to upgrade and modernize their system of sales of agricultural products, and the farmers organized a protest rally just outside New Delhi to demand the legislation be repealed because of their belief it would harm their incomes, Justin Trudeau stated his support of the farmers -- mostly Sikh -- to play to Canada's large Sikh population. At that time he was pleased to urge Indian Prime Minister Modi to 'listen' to the protesters.

As for Canada's Truck Convoy, there are those in the U.S. cheering it on; Republicans and far-right figures, including former President Donald Trump, Texas Senator Ted Cruz and Georgie Representative MarjorieTaylor Greene. They'll have their own Truckers Convoy to contend with, one planned to possibly interrupt the Super Bowl and Mr. Biden's State of the Union address on March 1st.

The original GoFundMe campaign to raise funds in support of the protest saw $10 million raised in the space of a week, but the GoFundMe organizers decided to freeze the funds. Whereupon the Convoy organizers turned to an alternative source, the U.S. GiveSendGo fundraising site which has almost now matched the original fundraising of $10 million, and which, unlike its predecessor has defied Canadian government wishes that the funds raised not be given to the Truck Convoy organizers.

According to Christian Leuprecht, a professor at Royal Military College and Queen's University, "the amount of money that's being raised, the pace at which it's being raised, raises serious questions about the sources of the money", that it's "not inconceivable" that some of the funding may have come from Russia. 
 
What is undeniable, is that Canadian truckers have a legitimate grievance. There was no need to mandate vaccinations for the mere ten percent of the trucking industry that remains unvaccinated, depriving them of their livelihood and Canadians of ongoing food deliveries. A miserable failure of an incompetent federal government in its zeal to control the public to an extent not seen other than in wartime situations.

Justin Trudeau
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau leaves a news conference after announcing the Emergencies Act will be invoked to deal with protests, Monday, February 14, 2022 in Ottawa. Trudeau says he has invoked the Emergencies Act to bring to an end antigovernment blockades he describes as illegal and not about peaceful protest. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld

Labels: , , , , , ,

 
()() Follow @rheytah Tweet