Ruminations

Blog dedicated primarily to randomly selected news items; comments reflecting personal perceptions

Friday, July 07, 2017

Alert: Grain of Salt Required 

"FALSE. Naturopathic doctors are not medically trained. They learn pseudoscience. Stop lying."
"They [student naturopaths] take classes with the same names as medical school courses. But pseudoscience and nonsensical information is integrated into every course."
Britt Hermes, biomedical researcher

"True or False? Naturopathic doctors are medically trained?"
"Of course we are. It's time for a second opinion about your health [check out 'FindMyND.ca'."
Public relations video, Canadian Association of Naturopaths
A scene from a video campaign by the Canadian Association of Naturopathic Doctors highlighting its members' “medical training.”CAND/YouTube
"[The videos belong to a three-year plan] to educate the public and to ensure they're aware who naturopathic doctors are and what they do."
"[Though] very definitely not doctors [naturopaths have] very similar training [the primary variance is their] philosophical approach] to patients."                     "[Naturopaths] treat patients as an individual and look at all aspects of their health." "[The position of the CAND and the profession] is that we understand the value of the role of vaccines and we are not opposed to vaccination."                                                                                                              Shawn O'Reilly, executive director, Canadian Association of Naturopathic Doctors
"If naturopathic medicine were governed by science, as practitioners increasingly claim, they would not provide: detoxification services, homeopathic remedies, most herbal remedies, and cosmetic facial acupuncture.  But these types of services are, as evidenced by clinic websites, the core of naturopathic medicine.  If you don’t believe me, I invite you to Google “detoxification and naturopath”.  You will get a list of clinics offering things like colon cleanses (useless, potentially harmful, and a bit disgusting), ionic foot baths that create an “energy field similar to that found in the human body” (so scientifically ridiculous that it borders on parody), and infrared sauna therapy (ditto)."
"The profession is not wedded to a scientific worldview. It is a practice built around a philosophical framework based on the alleged 'healing power of nature' or, to quote the Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, the 'principle of healing through the cooperative power of nature' and the 'individual’s inherent self-healing mechanisms.' This kind of rhetoric may sound inviting, particularly since it plays to eternally popular and consistently unsupportable idea that 'natural' is always better (try consuming some arsenic, tar sand, or mercury). It is, however, scientifically meaningless.
What naturopaths – and, for that matter, other alternative practitioners – increasingly suggest is that they are in a position to integrate the best of both conventional and alternative practices. They can, or so they claim, slide between the worlds of pseudoscience and science. They can offer ionic footbaths and, at the same time, push provincial governments for the right to provide patients with more conventional, and potentially harmful, procedures and drugs.
"So, it's very misleading to say 'medically trained', as I think most would interpret this as 'science-trained'."
Timothy Caulfield, health policy expert, University of Alberta
Dr. Caulfield headed a study published in the Journal of Law and the Biosciences recently wherein the discourse led from overtly anti-vaxx within the naturopathic community to "those that subtly undermine the relevant science". Within the naturopathic community there were those who linked thimerosal a preservative based in mercury, to autism and Asperger Syndrome in the complete absence of credible evidence in support of their claim. Aside from which almost all vaccines in Canada are thimerosal-free.

In response to the blatant stretching of the truth in the advertisements released by the Canadian Association of Naturopathic Doctors, Dr. Caulfield feels that advertising laws should be more regulated to reduce the likelihood of alternative medicine providers to their self-regulation status, and to restrict their practise in offering unproven tests and treatments to patients trusting their public relations bumph. An earlier study of Dr. Caulfield's found without much exception that naturopaths claim the efficacy of scientifically unsupported therapies like homeopathy, colon cleansing and IV vitamin therapy.

An undergraduate degree is a requirement for admission to naturopathic training programs; that undergraduate degree is acceptable in any field of study, along with prerequisite sciences studies. What follows is a four-year program of full-time study which includes basic science, clinical sciences and diagnostics. Over 80 percent of its students, according to CAND's executive director Ms. O'Reilly, "come in with a health sciences type of degree" so they fit right in to the following 1,400 hours devoted to basic medical science courses like biochemistry, anatomy and embryology.

One woman who graduated from Washington state's Bastyr University in 2011 -- an accredited naturopathic training program -- described the training however, as distinctly and wholly at variance to counterpart training in conventional accredited medical schools. In naturopathic study there is no requirement for students to take medical entrance exams. Naturopaths have no need to complete residency or post-graduate training, and the pre-requisite sciences course are on the introductory level. After she left naturopathy she enrolled herself in a medical school to obtain a degree in biomedical research.

While training as a naturopath, she pointed out, she was taught to treat neurological conditions like Parkinson's with homeopathic remedies and high-dose intravenous vitamins. The paediatrics course she took in naturopathy was replete with "anti-vaccine" propaganda". She recognized the danger in applied naturopathic programs with their therapies of dubious value, citing the turmeric infusion that caused the death of a 30-year--old woman in San Diego who had sought naturopathic treatment for eczema. All of which convinced her to leave the profession.

She takes issue with the naturopathic profession's attempts to inflate its legitimacy and position its services as based in science, even while much of what it practises with its patients has only a glancing resemblance to legitimate, licensed medical doctors' practises. What set off the latest controversy on the legitimacy of the claims of the naturopathic community of health practitioners is their "Medically Trained Naturally Focused" campaign featuring a series of YouTube videos promulgating false information to convince the public of their reliability as medical practitioners.

Labels: , , ,

Friday, April 29, 2016

Regret There Is None

"They definitely, definitely loved their son but as stated in our closing arguments, unfortunately sometimes love just isn't enough."
"Parents still have to follow a standard of care as set by criminal law."
Crown prosecutor Lisa Welch, Lethbridge courthouse, Alberta

"It's like a religion to them [naturopathy]. Studies have shown that some people are more likely to believe these kinds of things [all things natural trump science]."
"They're more likely to believe in the supernatural. They're more likely to be religious and they're more likely to buy the entire package of complementary and alternative practices."
Tim Caulfield, Health Law and Science Policy Group, University of Alberta

"Our doctors are required to understand their limitations of their practice and as such, when the situation arises where a naturopathic doctor recognizes the patient care is beyond their scope of practice, or beyond their limitations, that they would refer to an appropriate health-care provider."
Beverly Huang, president, College of Naturopathic Doctors of Alberta
David and Collet Stephan leave the courthouse on Tuesday, April 26, 2016, in Lethbridge, Alta. The Stephans were on trial, charged with failing to provide the necessaries of life to their son Ezekiel in 2012.
David and Collet Stephan leave the courthouse on Tuesday, April 26, 2016, in Lethbridge, Alta. The Stephans were on trial, charged with failing to provide the necessaries of life to their son Ezekiel in 2012. (David Rossiter/Canadian Press)

The science-nature dichotomy pits that part of a population believing in natural healing remedies against people who place their faith in medical science. This polarization comes to the fore from time to time when those who have trust in the potency of natural and/or traditional medications derived from plant sources without the interference of modern pharmacological strains held by science to be superior and specifically formulated to respond to particular medical conditions adhere to their beliefs and in so doing bypass medical science to the detriment of a patient, usually a child, who succumbs to a dire illness that would have responded positively to medical treatment.

And such was the case with David Stephan and his wife Collet, found guilty of failing to provide the necessities of life for their 19-month old child Ezekiel, who died in 2012 of meningitis, a condition which they treated with a 'potent' echinacea formulation obtained from a naturopathic clinic. The child's father is employed at a company called Truehope Nutritional Support, in Raymond, Alberta. In 2004 Health Canada had attempted to launch a court case to stop the distribution of the company's supplement Empowerplus.

The company had laid claims that its product could empower people using it to manage mental illnesses like bipolar disorder. Health Canada issued warnings to the public about the product. But in 2006 the company was found not guilty in court, of distributing Empowerplus without a drug identification number. The trial in Lethbridge against David and Collet Stephan heard evidence that the parents of the toddler Ezekiel had attempted to treat his illness with Empowerplus.

The child was so ill that days before he was finally rushed to hospital his parents had been giving him fluids through an eye-dropper because he was so debilitated and incapable of responding that he would not or could not eat or drink. Collet Stephan, the jury heard, had researched treatments for viral meningitis online before she obtained an echinacea mixture from the Lethbridge naturopath, Tracey Tannis.

"I will be ... gathering information about Dr. Tannis's involvement in this matter", Kristen Tanaka, the College of Naturopathic Doctors of Alberta's complaints director advised, responding to a complaint by Dr. Michelle Cohen, a Brighton, Ontario family physician who collected signatures of doctors from across Canada, protesting against the health practise of naturopathy that placed Ezekiel Stephan's life at risk. Dr. Tannis testified in court that she had instructed the child's mother to take him directly to hospital.

hi-ezekiel-stephan-852-8col
Ezekiel Stephan died in March 2012. An autopsy shows he had meningitis. (Stephan family)

Found guilty of the charges laid against them, the parents of little Ezekiel will now face jail time. At the present time both are out on bail. And they remain convinced they did nothing wrong, that they are the victims of a vengeful medical community and an oblivious society that misplaces its trust in conventional medical science. Ezekiel was their  youngest child, they have other, older children upon whom they can practise naturopathy when they too become ill.
"I only wish that you could've seen how you [the jury] were being played by the Crown's deception, drama and trickery that not only led to our key witnesses being muzzled, but has also now led to a dangerous precedent being set in Canada."
"The floodgates have now been opened and if we do not fall in line with parenting as seen fit by the government, we all stand in risk of criminal prosecution."
"May heaven help us all!"
"It was just definitely heart wrenching to see the direction that it [the trial] went. There's the Crown's version of our story, then there's our story of us who actually lived it."
"Not so much for ourselves [considering appealing the verdict], but for the fact this sets a tremendous precedent for the Canadian populace. It would have been easier for us just to take a plea bargain a long time ago and just basically keep living our lives, but we didn't want this precedent being set. That's why we proceeded forward in the first place."
"I don't know yet whether we're going to throw in the towel."
David Stephen, father of Ezekiel Stephan

Labels: , , , ,

 
()() Follow @rheytah Tweet