Ruminations

Blog dedicated primarily to randomly selected news items; comments reflecting personal perceptions

Saturday, September 05, 2026

White, Straight, Male Applicants...Kindly Don't Bother

https://aristotlefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/iStock-1413177861-e1788229776536-1024x905.jpg
"[Of 302 government job openings 42 percent were subject to] explicit or potential prioritization based on group identity."
"These postings go beyond signalling an inclusive workplace culture or encouraging applications from particular communities."
"They explicitly disclose that certain groups may or will receive priority consideration in the selection process." 
"The expansion of identity-based selection practices risks undermining both the integrity and perceived legitimacy of the federal staffing system." 
Aristotle Foundation for Public Policy report 
 
"To achieve a representative workforce, selection may be based on qualified candidates self-declaring as belonging to one or more of the designated groups: Indigenous Peoples, members of visible minorities, persons with disabilities, and women."
Defence Intelligence Office, position posting, Department of National Defence 
 
"[Applicants must declare whether they are members of a] designated employment equity group."
"Diversity and inclusion are foundational values at Transport Canada and are core to who we are."
"We strive to become an organization where everyone feels that their voice, views, values and life experiences are heard."
Transport Canada position posting 
https://smartcdn.gprod.postmedia.digital/nationalpost/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/DND-2.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=564&h=423&type=webp&sig=1sKCBZRqQUUmb0HpPiKQXg
Department of National Defence headquarters in Ottawa. A job ad posted by DND this year for a Defence Intelligence Officer said “selection may be based on qualified candidates self-declaring as belonging to one or more of the designated groups: Indigenous Peoples, members of visible minorities, persons with disabilities, and women.” Photo by Spencer Colby/Postmedia
 
In Canada, hiring based on 'equity' has become sacrosanct in the Liberal federal government's playbook of hiring, to reflect an official position that government-based organizations must match precisely the Canadian demographic within the broader population. Deviations from this process are not to be countenanced, as evidence of systemic discrimination sullying the hiring atmosphere. According to the Aristotle Foundation for Public Policy, Canada has gone to lengths unprecedented to ensure it is well understood that this is a  country definitely not "rigged to disfavour racial minorities".
 
Critical jobs within the federal government such as safety inspectors and intelligence agent applicants are informed explicitly that if their profile fails to fit within an "equity-deserving" identity category -- where new personnel before hiring are screened based on race and identity -- they are likely to be rejected. Fully 100 percent of new hires are screened based on race and identity in some key federal departments, as is made clear by a newly-released report by the Aristotle Foundation.
 
As example, an emergency management position within Parks Canada was prioritized for equity: "We promote employment equity and encourage you to self-declare if you belong to one of the designated employment equity groups when you apply", potential applicants were advised. Three departments were identified in the report's analysis -- which pointed out that equity-based screening was de rigueur throughout the federal government -- stating that based on race, gender or ability, candidates would be prioritized.
 
The National Research Council, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada deem that every job they post must contain an "explicit or potential prioritization based on group identity". At the Department of National Defence, 92 percent of job postings inform candidates they would be subject to identity discrimination. Not unlike earlier finding in 2025 examining Canadian university hiring practices, where "...98 percent of academic postings ... directly or indirectly discriminated against non-minorities".
 
It is within the past decade that these practices taking the form of mandatory hiring quotas based on race, gender and other 'identity' characteristics have been implemented. A decade reflected by Liberal government rule. As example, internal 'equity targets' set in 2018 at the Department of National Defence, now require that 25 percent of uniformed personnel be female, 3.5 percent be Indigenous, and 11.8 percent 'visible minority'.
 
https://smartcdn.gprod.postmedia.digital/nationalpost/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/GRAPH1.png?quality=90&strip=all&w=564&type=webp&sig=HUyiX6b4zMPHCglHYnc4fw
Aristotle Foundation for Public Policy report
 

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, January 09, 2021

Canada, Bringing Up The Rear On COVID Vaccinations

"The slow arrival of COVID-19 vaccines is the latest setback for Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in confronting the biggest challenge of his political career. His overarching responsibility is to reduce the number of infections and mortality from the pandemic and mitigate its devastating impact on the economy."
"Tragically for the country, that delay extends the time Canadians are at risk of exposure, illness and death."
Joe Oliver, former Canadian Minister of Finance and of Natural Resources
Ottawa Hospital
Nurse Venus Lucero administers the first Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine at the Ottawa Hospital to Jo-Anne Miner at a vaccination clinic, Tuesday December 15, 2020 in Ottawa. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld
 
Justin Trudeau may have lingering memories of his father Pierre Elliott Trudeau opening up to China in 1968 that has led him -- much as he recalls his own visits as a toddler with his parents going to Cuba -- viewing both countries with affection. Trudeau the elder had a fondness for 'socialism' and  his son appears to harbour a fascinate wonder -- let's call it curiosity with a bit of envy thrown in -- for dictatorships. He once, before becoming leader of the Liberal Party and ultimately the country's current prime minister, expressed his admiration for China's 'basic dictatorship', capable of 'turning on a dime'.
Pierre Trudeau gets a little assistance with his chopsticks from Chinese premier Chou En-Lai during a meal in China in an October, 1973, visit to mainland China.

China, with its immense population and huge business opportunities in trade and investment, in fact, seems to fascinate the Liberal Party of Canada altogether. Former Prime Minister Jean Chretien went to great ends, embarking on huge trade missions to China, forging personal 'friendships' with business leaders in China, and using those invaluable contacts when he retired from public life and joined a high-powered legal firm where he could boast of his contacts, and bring along corporate leaders in private business delegations to China. His influence no doubt resonated with Trudeau junior.

Canada's more current and less felicitous entanglements with China have turned the relationship beyond frosty, with Beijing making use of diplomatic hostage-taking of Canadian citizens to emphasize its displeasure that Canada has taken the CFO of Huawei Technologies into custody on the basis of an extradition request by the United States. Relations between the two countries have plummeted to a new low, Beijing slinging crude insults and threats and the Trudeau government fearing to state unequivocally that Huawei will not be involved in Canada's 5G upgrade as part of the Five Eyes Intelligence group.

Despite this toxic background, the prime minister still saw fit to sign an agreement with CanSino Biologics based in Tianjin, for joint cooperation on a COVID vaccine, with Canada's National Research Council. An agreement that collapsed ultimately when authorities in China refused to permit vaccine samples to be exported to Canada for testing as agreed upon. This was Canada placing its eggs in the wrong basket. And then playing catch-up by belatedly contracting for vaccines being produced by British and American pharmaceuticals.
 
Paramedics transport a resident from Midland Gardens Care Community in Toronto on Jan. 5. (Evan Mitsui/CBC)
 
Not to be forgotten was the Liberal government's generosity in ransacking the nation's own short supplies of PPE in sympathy with China's efforts to control its first wave of the novel coronavirus, sending those supplies off to China. When it soon afterward came Canada's turn to discover first-hand what it was like to face PPE shortages at a time of infectious chaos within the Canadian population, orders were placed with Chinese manufacturers of PPE, and though the initial shipments were held back by Chinese authorities, when later shipments did arrive, they were discovered to be faulty and useless.

When the Trudeau government finally realized it must source vaccines elsewhere than with its agreement in co-developing a vaccine with a Chinese pharmaceutical company which had links with the People's Liberation Army, it found itself at the tail end of a line-up of countries anxious to secure vaccines for their own populations. And that's when it went overboard, to contract with a number of pharmaceutical companies and in total secured access to 414 vaccines, vastly exceeding the numbers required for a population of 38 million people. 

That having been accomplished, by the end of January the country plans to be in the position to have on hand sufficient vaccines to inoculate roughly two percent of the population. Compare that with 13 percent in the U.S. and 22 percent in Israel. By early April the United Kingdom expects it will have successfully vaccinated its entire population -- while Israel which has completed a million vaccinations expects to have completed inoculating its entire population of nine million by March at the very latest.
 
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine delivered in Que.
The first doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine are delivered to the Maimonides CHSLD, Monday, December 14, 2020 in Montreal. The long-term care facility is slated to be one of the first in Canada to administer the vaccine. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Ryan Remiorz
"In Canada, we have military generals in charge of our rollout, but they don’t seem to have much sway."
"We rushed to get the first vaccines into health workers and elders because that made for good photo opportunities. But getting the subsequent vaccines to more people seems to have been treated with shocking lassitude."
"There is nothing more symbolic of this disdain than the fact that Canadian politicians were sunning themselves in places such as Hawaii, St. Barts and Barbados while vaccines languished in freezers back home. What’s unfortunate, however, is that the antics of scofflaw politicians have generated far more media attention than the slow vaccine rollout that will ultimately cost lives."
Andre Picard, The Globe and Mail

Labels: , , , , , ,

 
()() Follow @rheytah Tweet