By Jonathan Amos
Science correspondent, BBC News, San Francisco
The work hinges on the effects of atmospheric composition on drops' flights
The
imprints of raindrops preserved in 2.7bn-year-old rock are being used
to figure out what the atmosphere was like on the early Earth.
Scientists have used the depressions drops left to calculate how fast they were going as they impacted the ground.
This has allowed them to determine the density of air in ancient times.
This "palaeobarometry" approach, revealed at the
AGU Fall Meeting, will help constrain the models that try to simulate conditions in Archaean times.
Earth 2.7 billion years ago was very different from the planet we know today.
It spun much faster, the Moon was closer and the Sun was much
weaker. And there were no animals or plants in existence back then; the
air was simply not breathable.
"There was probably quite a bit of nitrogen in the
atmosphere, like today, but there was no oxygen," explained Sanjoy Som
from Nasa's Ames Research Center.
"The oxygen was likely replaced by greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane.
"My palaeobarometry work cannot tell you precisely what the
gases were, but it will assist modellers of atmospheric composition by
giving them a constraint," he told BBC News.
Dr Som told the AGU meeting - the largest annual gathering of
Earth scientists - that the "fossil raindrops" were discovered in
Ventersdorp in the North West Province of South Africa in the 1980s.
They consist of lots of pits in the surface of a rock that started out as volcanic ash-fall.
Rain tumbling on to the ash would have dug out small
depressions, which were then subsequently covered over by further ash
deposits and lithified, or turned to stone.
We only see the imprints today because the top layers of the rock have now been eroded back.
Dr Som's and colleagues' thinking is that the pits should tell us something about ancient air pressure.
Gathering momentum
Their starting point is that the diameters of the imprints are
controlled ultimately by the top speed of the raindrops as they hit the
ground.
This number - the terminal velocity - is dependent on air density. In the modern atmosphere it is about 9m/s.
"The rationale here is that if the air back then was thicker,
the raindrops would fall slower, and the craters in the ash would be
smaller; and conversely, if the air was thinner, the drops would fall
faster and the craters would be larger," said Dr Som, who is also
affiliated to the Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle.
The confounding factor would be if raindrops were somehow
much bigger in Archaean times. Fortunately, it turns out the maximum
size a raindrop can reach is independent of air density; it is
controlled by aerodynamic forces that are unrelated to the thickness of
the air.
The pits were created in ash at a time when the Earth looked very different from today
The fattest drops 2.7bn years ago would have been the same as they are today - about 7mm.
Dr Som's team conducted experiments in which, using a
pipette, they dripped small, carefully controlled volumes of water into a
tray of volcanic ash from a height of about 25m.
This allowed the group to relate the momentum of a raindrop
to the size of the imprints made; and then, using theory, to calculate
the momentum of a drop of a known size at any air density.
The team concluded that if the biggest imprints in the
Ventersdorp rock were formed by the largest raindrops, air pressure in
the Archaean could have been no more than twice what it is today.
"But knowing what we do about the spread of raindrop sizes, we know the largest possible size is actually quite rare.
"So if it was smaller raindrops that formed the largest
imprints at Ventersdorp then the atmospheric density was probably
similar to ours, if not less."
The study supports the idea therefore that the ancient atmosphere must have had a strong concentration of greenhouse gases.
If air pressure were the same or even lower than it is today,
there is no other way to explain why Earth was not thrown into snowball
conditions by a substantially weaker Sun.
Without extra thickness in the atmosphere to trap heat, the properties of the gases themselves had to provide the blanket.
Jonathan.Amos-INTERNET@bbc.co.uk and follow me on Twitter:
@BBCAmos
Labels: Nature, Paleontology, Science