Ruminations

Blog dedicated primarily to randomly selected news items; comments reflecting personal perceptions

Friday, November 25, 2016

Which is the Oppressor now, the Heterosexual or the Homosexual?

Pronoun cards 2016-01

Pronoun cards 2016-02


In the ongoing saga of University of Toronto psychology Professor Jordan Peterson, he is being reviled and excoriated by the vast army of the politically correct for having exhibiting publicly the unacceptable temerity as an individual who refuses to succumb to the popular social demands that what the LGBTQ2 community calls 'straights' accept without question their language rights. Infusing them with the epithet of 'homophobic' for failing to bow to ever-increasing, more ludicrously gender-bending demands of recognition and obeisance to the agenda of harnessing righteous indignation that among the 99% of society's heterosexuals there are those who refuse to honour their precious tantrums.

Professor Peterson posted several videos wherein he made it clear that the preposterous demands that language be co-opted and coded to reflect the vast cornucopia of new and evolving gender identities requiring that the prevailing, traditional historical language of gender identity be scrapped in favour of adopting LGBTQ2's labyrinthine logic that distorting pronouns well beyond recognition will satisfy the wounded psyches of those who happen not to fall into the recognized and naturally occurring sex roles of male and female.

Tyler Anderson/National Post
Tyler Anderson/National Post    Quinn Valkyrie holds a sign at a protest against anti-political correctness professor Jordan Peterson at University of Toronto on Oct. 5.
 
The passions that Professor Peterson's perfectly sane explanation that language, though malleable, should never be the victim of a minuscule minority's field of complex identity issues aggressively pursued so that the general public has an obligation to learn a multitude of pronouns to satisfy the whimsical demands of that wounded one percent in society confused about their gender identities, has been swift and corrosive. His more 'understanding', compassionate and politically correct academic peers were quick to criticize his outspokenness. His university has looked askance at the controversy and his academic standing within it may be imperilled.

Governments themselves are literally bending over backwards, pretzelling themselves to bend language completely out of shape and understanding in a confusion of responses, all genuflecting in the direction of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender community which has been enthusiastically  engaged in proving that tired old adage that it is the squeaky wheel that gets the grease. And so, amendments which recently passed in the Canadian House of Commons after having been given the green light of acceptability by the Canadian Human Rights Code and the Criminal Code add "gender identity" and "gender expression" as grounds for legal protection in Canada.

The University of Toronto set up a forum to argue the need for those amendments. On the dissenting side was Professor Peterson, and on the assent-demand side were two female professors, one of whom was Dr. Mary Bryson of the University of British Columbia, both experts on the issue of gender identity and gender expression. Perhaps both also qualify as experts on gender oppression as well, intimidating and threatening those whose social morals don't quite align with their own. It has been reported that a former student of a Women's Studies course in 1991 at UBC found herself in a state of fearful and disgusted apprehension taking Dr. Bryson's course.

U of T Professor Jordan Peterson debates Bill C-16 on Nov. 19, 2016.
Dave Abel/Postmedia Network   U of T Professor Jordan Peterson debates Bill C-16 on Nov. 19, 2016. Dr. Bryson is third from left.
"The students sat there in stunned, awkward silence. We had no idea what to say, what to do or where to look."
"We told them [the university] everything that was happening I assumed that Bryson wouldn't be permitted to teach at UBC any more."
"Imagine a male professor forcing female students to watch violent pornography. Imagine a male professor inviting a male guest speaker to drop his pants and expose himself to students. Imagine this prof telling students how to dress for his class and forcing them to publicly announce their personal grooming habits and their sexual orientation, and then proceed to shame students on that basis."
"It would be a national scandal."
Former UBC student, name withheld

"We take seriously any concerns raised by past or current students about their learning experiences at UBC."
"[However, the university requires] some time to look through our files as this involves a course taught 25 years ago."
Dr. Angela Redish, provost, acting academic vice-president, UBC
Professor Bryson, one of the two who debated against Professor Peterson on Bill C-165 and the Ontario Human Rights Code gender provisions, was not dismissed from UBC's teaching staff. What did occur in fact was that she became tenured, then was elevated to the post of director of the university's Institute for Gender, Race, Sexuality and Social Justice, and more latterly was named senior associate dean of the education faculty. The young woman, now in her mid-40s who spoke of her ordeal in Professor Bryson's Women's Studies class graduated with her master's in religious studies from UBC and moved on and into her career, her experience with Dr. Bryson, a bad memory.

The course she took part in was labelled "From the Margins: Lesbian Subjects Matter". In 1993 an article written by Dr. Bryson and a co-author, described a course co-taught by them in 1991. Their article was titled "Queer Pedagogy: Praxis Makes Im/Perfect", published in the Canadian Journal of Education. In the article they pointed out that the heterosexual and white students in their class were informed they would need to "function and circulate differently in a lesbian-identified space". Their students were advised to "choose either to remain silent about their sexual identification or to present themselves as 'out lesbians'."

Their class, they pointed out was one where the "unsayable" could be uttered, where so-called deviant images could be represented ... within the oppressive confines of the always-already heterosexualized classrooms. Where heterosexuals were identified as the enemy and, in the words of the former student "those of us who liked men, who had intimate relations with men were mocked .... " Aside from declaring their sexual orientation, students were informed that all sex with men was inherently violet. The students were exposed to a "Butch/Femme in Paradise", short video containing graphic images, which Dr. Bryson explains as "an art film" where the activities were "entirely consensual".

Actually, degenerate is the first descriptive that comes to mind.

Labels: , ,

Saturday, September 28, 2013

The New Liberal Marijuana Party

The Liberal Party of Canada under its new leader, Justin Trudeau, rejected any possibility that to gain traction against the ruling Conservative Party of Prime Minister Stephen Harper, it would consider a merge with the New Democratic Party. It is the NDP that nudged aside the Liberals from official opposition status, gaining more seats within the Liberals' traditional source of power within the country, leaving the Liberals in a pathetic third place after its 2006 meltdown and a succession of leaders who were unable to enthuse Canadian voters.

Justin Trudeau, however, that's another matter altogether. He has panache, youth, an infectious personality and appeal, along with the propensity to speak whatever comes to mind, incautiously, which might represent a fault in anyone else, but endears him to the public. His frank, uncalled-for admission that he smoked pot with friends while a sitting MP, and his later interview where he spoke of his intention to see marijuana legalized and taxed just like any other recreational drug reveals his platform, it would seem. A decision to link his party with the Marijuana Party.

While the state of the Canadian economy remains top of mind to most Canadians thinking ahead toward the future, and is the top consideration of the current Conservative-led government, Justin Trudeau hasn't much to say about the economy and how he and his party would undertake measures according to a well-thought-out plan of action to ensure its ongoing robust condition. He feels, he has more or less stated, that to set out his position on the economy is premature.

But his position on an important social message on make marijuana legally available to all who wish to use it, while at the same time protecting young Canadians from its prevalence much as is done with tobacco, is of prime importance, is being addressed, and is causing quite a stir in the public. There will be job creation in establishing legal and large-scale marijuana production facilities.

At the present time, just coincidentally, plans are afoot that a medical marijuana facility be opened at an old abandoned chocolate factory.

Willie Wonka would love that one. Two treats; chocolate failed, but marijuana seems a winner; take your pick. More presumably modest plans for the production of medical marijuana, but once the law establishes that marijuana should be seen not as a gateway drug to more dangerous illegal drugs like cocaine, but nothing different than smoking a cigarette or having a drink, then production can be ramped up, the facilities expanded, and a larger work staff taken on.

Utilizing the old Hershey chocolate plant in Smiths Falls for an initial production staff of 100 employees is a start, one that makes the mayor of Smiths Falls fairly ecstatic for the future of his hard-done-by community. "It's going to happen somewhere in Canada, our community of Smiths Falls -- population 9.000 -- have lost 1,700 jobs in the last five or six years. Our doors are open to try and attract new investment and more fundamentally, recreate and re-establish some of the jobs that have been lost here."


He was speaking glowingly of the revelation that Tweed Inc. plans to use 180,000 square feet of the 470,000 former Hershey chocolate plant complex located in Smiths Falls, and empty of any kind of production since 2008. It was due for demolition if Icon International couldn't find tenants. "We've been shaking the trees and looking in the bushes for the last five or six years ... to try and find a user, but it's such a large physical plant", said Mayor Dennis Staples.

Well, look no more. The town's saviour has arrived. And the Canadian public is about to be extremely well served and serviced. About 30,000 Canadians have been prescribed, up to the present time, the use of medical marijuana for health and pain-relief purposes, according to Health Canada. Tweed, the company that proposes to locate its facilities in Smiths Falls, foresees operating at full capacity as soon as its operation is set up and fully functional.

And, how appropriate, given the circumstances; its corporate team has a handful of ties to the Liberals. Its founder and CEO, Chuck Rifici currently serves as the chief financial officer for the national Liberal Party's board of directors. "It seems Justin Trudeau's focus is on legalizing marijuana...", said Prime Minister Stephen Harper's deputy director of communications.

And, added Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney of the issue of the new plant opening, recently come to his attention: "[Chuck Rifici] plans to open a massive medical marijuana operation in rural Ontario, while the Liberal leader champions marijuana legalization." Something seems to be questionable in the State of Canadian Affairs; values, priorities, ethics and awareness of the greater social good.

But the economy is, after all, being highlighted, it appears. For Tweed Inc. Chairman, Bruce Linton was a past president of the Carleton University Students Association. Posters have appeared at Carleton extolling legalization, claiming that two-thirds of all Canadians have a wish to legalize or decriminalize marijuana. The Young Liberals of Canada provided those posters on campus "to engage youth in a conversation about the legalization of marijuana", according to Liberal communications manager Andree-Lyne Halle.

Reaching the hearts and minds and voting fervour of young Canadians through appealing not to their sense of mature democratic responsibility, but their partying instincts. The posters include a code linking with a "Join the Party" website with a message: "The Liberal Party of Canada wants to treat Canadians like adults. Prohibition has failed, let's create a smarter way." Those disagreeing are most obviously socially immature.
Tomas Belanger smokes a quarter-pound joint on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, April 20, 2013. Thousands of people crowded onto Parliament Hill to mark the event known as 4/20, an annual rally calling for the legalization of marijuana.
Tomas Belanger smokes a quarter-pound joint on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, April 20, 2013. Thousands of people crowded onto Parliament Hill to mark the event known as 4/20, an annual rally calling for the legalization of marijuana.  Photograph by: Chris Roussakis
"The fact that one of Justin Trudeau's first policy priorities is legalizing marijuana demonstrates that he does not have the judgement to be prime minister"; a statement issued by Conservative party officials. "With absolutely no economic policy, Justin Trudeau's highest priority remains legalizing marijuana", added Mr. Blaney, Minister of Public Safety. "Canadians deserve to know why Justin Trudeau wants to make it easier for children to access drugs"

As it is currently, the possession and use of marijuana other than for medicinal purposes remains illegal in Canada. It is used, despite that, by so many people that considering legalizing its use might represent a issue whose time has come, quite apart from the status as a subject of primary importance it is given by the Mr. Trudeau and the Liberals. Criminal penalties accruing to those arrested or threatened by the law for casual use seems outdated.

On the other hand, marijuana use by Canadian teens "is among the highest in the world", according to the Canadian Public Health Association. And the issue of whether, when, how and why there might be harm in its ongoing, long-time and over-use still has not been adequately settled by medical science. Its use or misuse can become a problem with operating a motor vehicle. Its effect on the still-maturing brain remains another issue.

This is not a simple matter with a simple answer. But nor is it an issue that should be top of the agenda for a major federal political party to solve in advance of other high-priority issues facing the country today.

The Peace Tower is reflected in the sunglasses of a woman as she celebrates 4/20 on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, April 20, 2013. Thousands of people crowded onto Parliament Hill to mark the event known as 4/20, an annual rally calling for the legalization of marijuana.The Peace Tower is reflected in the sunglasses of a woman as she she celebrates 4/20 on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, April 20, 2013. Thousands of people crowded onto Parliament Hill to mark the event known as 4/20, an annual rally calling for the legalization of marijuana.      Photograph by: Chris Roussakis

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, August 02, 2013

Genetically Modified Life-Savers

"Do you think I should show pictures of blind babies in my slide shows?
"I therefore hold the regulation of genetic engineering responsible for the death and blindness of thousands of children and young mothers."
German biologist Ingo Potrykus, Nature magazine
Half a million, perhaps two million children die each year from preventable vitamin A deficiency in the developing world. Vitamin A deficiency in developing countries is one of the most pervasive and preventable causes of morbidity and mortality in poor countries whose major nutritional source is derived from rice. Concerned with this solvable loss of human life, the German biologist Ingo Potrykus set out to do something about the situation.

He set out to solve a huge humanitarian challenge. He and a colleague, Peter Beyer, manipulated rice to introduce three genes to the already-existing 30,000 contained in rice. The purpose was to prevent vitamin A deficiency. They produced a rice called golden rice. They took no steps to themselves profit by this genetic modification technique and persuaded companies that produced it to waive patents, so the rice could be made freely available.

Golden rice, now capable of ensuring that vulnerable children and pregnant women have adequate vitamin A in their diets when they consume the most abundant food available to them in their countries of origin, has had no uptake. Even though Britain's agriculture minister endorsed GM crops, no one took any steps to investigate the promise of golden rice, and it has since languished, unused.

The agri-business Syngenta began producing Professor Potrykus's golden rice, adding two genes, one from maize, the other from a common soil bacterium, producing good yields that provide 60% of a child's daily vitamin A requirements from a mere 50 grams of rice. It was logically anticipated that the use of ordinary, vitamin A-deficient rice would be substituted for golden rice. It never happened.

Greenpeace campaigns stridently and strenuously against GM crops. The World Health Organization estimates 170-million to 230-million children, along with 20 million pregnant women are deficient in vitamin-A in their diets. That deficiency weakens the immune system to the extent that 1.9-million to 2.7-million people die each year from lack of vitamin A. Those are numbers far in excess of people dying yearly from AIDS, TB and malaria.

Greenpeace claims that golden rice represents a corporate plot, that it doesn't produce enough vitamin A, that it might cause health problems, might upset ecosystems, and that capsules of vitamin A represent a better source of vitamin A. And it lobbies governments with these arguments. Its claims are specious -- and vitamin A capsules are not readily available for most people living in indigent circumstances.

Result: the two researchers at Syngenta who improved golden rice have had to look elsewhere for employment, the company has left Britain, unable to sustain itself against the Greenpeace assaults. Critics of Greenpeace claim that if they accept the usefulness of one genetically modified grain, it will undermine their campaign in total against all GM crops.

One truth in all of this is that the non-profit, free, nutrition-enhanced rice is of estimable value to the poor. Or it would be if it were used, as it should be.

People in India and Burkina Faso grow cotton without the use of insecticides; a GM crop. A crop that boosts yields, cuts pesticide use and has allowed wildlife to return to nature. In contrast to a system of agriculture that is soil-exhausting, must use more land for comparable production results and licenses toxic sprays of manure that often results in fatal food poisoning; that system is termed 'organic', its reputation high and its supposed virtues unchallenged.

Organic farming benefits the wealthy who can pay more for the products. It has lower yields, uses double the land as inorganic farming to produce a similar quantity of produce, and using manure, risks outbreaks of fatal food poisoning. It permits fungicide chemicals, not hailed by some critics as a safe and useful alternative to commercially produced pesticides. Food scientists have ascertained organically-grown food offers no greater nutritional benefits.

Seems like a classic case of vested interests representing passionately sanctimonious environmental campaigners duping the hysterically gullible, at a simply dreadful cost to the vulnerable.

Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, July 27, 2013

Stirring the Mary-Jane Pot

Liberal leader Justin Trudeau has gone out of his way to bring the welfare of the Canadian middle-class under the broad umbrella of his musing concerns, expressing dismay presumably matching their own that family earnings have not maintained their upward momentum, falling behind while inflation eats up more of disposable income. He has now extended his concern to the topic of legalizing marijuana. Once alcohol was prohibited and it is now, by force of social pressures, legalized and heavily taxed, as is tobacco.

These substances are both avowedly and through scientific-medical research attested to represent health-averse materials whose constant use constitutes a threat to the integrity of users' bodily health. They are both heavily taxed, as a kind of moral penance. The idea being that taxes raise their cost to the consumer and in this manner make them less attractive to purchase. But people become accustomed to paying high prices for certain items, and go on to consume them regardless.

Presumably the taxes, which go into government general revenue streams, help pay for the cost to society in treating the eventual health consequences of their over-use. Both are well enough known to cause organ breakdown; heart, liver and lungs, aiding in the eventuality of strokes and heart attacks. Now, it seems, we can add another substance inimical to health. Not to hold Justin Trudeau to account for any of this; recreational drug use is a reality, and marijuana is the lesser of all such drug use.

Legalizing its growing, marketing and use would make it more accessible, more acceptable within society and lead to greater use. On the other hand, even as an illicit substance it is widely used, including among those too young to fully comprehend how it might conceivably deleteriously impact their lives. The operative word here is "might", since light, casual social use likely would never result in ill effects.

But drug use of any kind is a portal to the potential of abuse of far more potent drugs. And statistics appear to pinpoint that while the incidence of driving while under the influence of alcohol has been falling in prevalence, there has been an alarming rise of impaired driving relating to the use of drugs. Marijuana is a relatively light, casual, recreational drug but it is a drug and smoking it can cause ill health effects.
...it would be fallacious to conclude that because the chemicals in marijuana have been found to present fewer dangers than some very harmful substances, the medical or recreational use of marijuana is perfectly safe. In a recreational context, marijuana has been shown to affect health, brain function, and memory. And in a medical context, marijuana is like any other powerful prescription drug: it has potentially dangerous side effects, and the decision to use it to treat patients must involve the same balancing test as the one required for chemotherapy or AZT: do the therapeutic effects of the drug outweigh its harmful effects? Though there are many more studies to be done on this issue, current data shows that the answer to this question may not always be "yes."
Harvard University Berkman Center for Internet & Society
"I'm actually not in favour of decriminalizing cannabis. Tax it, regulate. It's one of the only ways to keep it out of the hands of our kids because the current war on drugs, the current model is not working. We have to use evidence and science to make sure we're moving forward on that", he said to an audience in Kelowna, B.C. this week. A statement that will find him in wild favour among the voting youth contingent in the country.

An April-released UNICEF report cited 4% of children aged 11, 13 and 15 reported smoking cigarettes "at least once a week"; 16% of that age group reported having been under the influence of alcohol on at least two occasions, and to round out the good tidings, fully 29% of young respondents reported "having used cannabis in the last 12 months." Canada ranks 29th on the UNICEF report; last among "rich" nations.

The Netherlands, Estonia, and Belgium where marijuana is decriminalized or legalized boast a lower number of children using (17%, 15% and 13% respectively). Compare those numbers to restrictive jurisdictions like Sweden with 5.5%, Norway with 4.6% and Iceland with 7% child usage of marijuana. The puzzle as to why and how it is that Canadian youth use is so relatively high isn't addressed.

This is a difficult topic to tackle. The 'war on drugs' has worked just about as well as the period of crime, bootlegging, cross-border smuggling and alcohol syndicates that arose when alcohol was under prohibition in the United States and Canada. Eventually it was recognized that more harm than good came out of the prohibition legislation.

Perhaps that will be the direction in which all national jurisdictions will eventually guide themselves. Latin America, where incendiary crime is associated with drug cartels costing innumerable lives, is now considering the feasibility of relaxing its prohibition laws. Human beings engage in self-destructive activities of all kinds, the insistence on prohibiting substances deleterious to health and longevity is a choice that cannot always be controlled.

Even if and when the greater society is left to pick up the sometimes disastrous results.

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Well, Oops!

"I am writing to inform you of an unfortunate incident that happened over the course of the last three weeks. I was stopped en route to my home by a member of the Ottawa Police Service and asked to undergo a breathalyzer test.
"As a result, my driver's licence was suspended for three (3) days.
"Although I was not charged with an offence, I deeply regret my behaviour and apologize to my constituents and council colleagues for any embarrassment this incident may have caused."
Peter Clark, Ottawa city councillor

Well, can't have Toronto hogging all the limelight with Mayor Rob Ford having all the fun, achieving celebrity status and defying convention and playing up his tough guy persona. Ain't no crack-smokin' allegations goin' to stick to him. Even if he has to buy the damn video himself. Though it's not likely his executive assistant will cough up the entrance fee; that's a federal story.

Ottawa doesn't like playing second fiddle in the news to big-city TO. So here's our own little scandal. Where a former regional chair of the Ottawa-Carleton Region before amalgamation, and current city councillor has taken pre-emptive steps hoping the entire sordid story won't surface, by addressing his fellow councillors in an email explanation. But guess what? it did. And, as a result it isn't only his colleagues who may be feeling rather put out.

It is alleged (ahem!) that Mr. Clark pulled rank with the police officer who pulled him over for a roadside breath test earlier in the month. And this is where the disreputable and offensive conduct came into play in scene two. He puffed over the legal limit of blood alcohol but not enough to warrant criminal charges. Despite which he huffily intimated he might become the victim of violence at the hands of police. That quite impressed the police officer.

At which point he brought out some additional artillery, claiming that he was a personal friend of Ottawa police Chief Charles Bordeleau. Hint-hint, officer. The officer, said Mr. Clark, recognized him, asked the reason for his remark impugning the integrity of police. "I'm not down on the police, I'm a friend of the police", he claims to have responded.

Suggesting that it was this statement, not one where he invoked his personal friendship with the chief that led the police officer to the accusation, since Mr. Clark acknowledged he doesn't know the chief, after all.

Mr. Clark had been playing bridge that evening with friends. One of whom suggested a drink for the road, and they stopped at the Playmate Club on Montreal Road - a truly grubby venue. "It's on the way home and it's convenient. The fact it's a strip club is not an issue with me. I don't avail myself of the young women there. Nobody'll ever accuse me of mauling the women because I never touch them", he said.

It just so happened that as he was driving home from the Playmate Club, Mr. Clark explains, he realized he was driving too fast, and slowed down. Which action caused the police officer to stop him, obviously feeling Mr. Clark had slowed to a crawl to look over a few prostitutes standing at the side of the street. Goodness, heaven forfend!

Whereupon the officer made his enquiry: "He asked me if I had a drink and I said yes and he asked me if I would blow and I said yes." He's still blowing.

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, May 06, 2013

Looking for Love? Watch out for Bogeymen....

It never ceases to amaze; the penchant of women to look for love everlasting in the most unlikely of places. What is there about psychopaths, about social deviants, about those who eschew society's values to such a degree that they commit to vicious acts of social derangement, landing in federal prisons for prolonged stays to prevent them from further violations of humane standards of behaviour, that makes them so attractive to women?

Why is it that serial killers have been able to attract the attention of women outside prison walls, to bring them into prison walls where they meet, make contact and 'fall in lust', and marry? What is wrong with these women? Are they just simply so compassionate that they cannot imagine incarcerating someone for heinous crimes, preferring to believe that an injustice has been committed and their love for the incarcerant will triumph and he will become good and decent and all will live happily ever after?

Well, it appears that one woman, of whom evidently it cannot be said she takes advantage of personal contact herself, was sufficiently moved by the thought of men held in prison, isolated from the softening effects of female companionship, lonely and deprived, to begin a prison dating online site that might attract people to one another. Men on the inside pining for female communication and women on the outside imagining how fulfilling it would be to find companionship inside a prison cell.

Canadian Inmates Connect is what the site is called, it's been on the web for almost a year and a half, and represents about forty inmates' personal stories. Many of those individual convict profiles represent people serving life sentences. The website is there primarily for the objective of seeking out pen pals. And since prisoners do not have access to computers, communication is by old-fashioned post.

Which is not a bad thing; it does have a certain distance to it.

The website does caution those interested that they should be alert to the possibility that no good may come of their participation in partnering with someone in prison. Still, the Toronto woman who initiated the website is convinced she is doing something useful for society. "I'm making a difference, for sure -- and that's become most important to me. It doesn't matter what they've done. It's not for me to judge.... I'm just a firm believer in redemption and rehabilitation.... I believe everybody deserves a second chance."

While warning people that they should be prepared to proceed with caution. The profiles as they are presented are the work of the convicts themselves. Nothing necessarily prompts them to tell the unvarnished truth about themselves. Canadian Inmates Connect cautions it's not responsible for any kind of relationship that may result from using its web pages as a conduit into some prisoner's life and whatever may come of that primary 'introduction'.

The Correctional Service of Canada has no comment on the presence and purpose of "an external site". "The safety of public, staff and inmates remains paramount" responded a spokesperson when asked to comment. One of the prisoners who has taken advantage of the site to make contact with a woman who has appealed to him and with whom he now has a prospective partner when he is finally released, utters his own caution:
"You're writing a federal inmate -- it's a dangerous thing.... These guys are the real deal. There are bogeymen in here."

Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, April 21, 2013

HazMat Safety and Security

There are the psychopaths in society, those whose hatred for institutions, for the social compact, for the people around them motivate them to become predators and killing machines. And then there are those who swoop in selflessly without a moment's thought that they are placing themselves in danger, desperate to aid those who have been caught up in a scene of disaster, and suffering.

They are the first-responders, passersby sometimes, but for the most part the professionals; police, firefighters, paramedics.

Without their humane, compassionate and security oriented response, scenes of mayhem and chaos would take far longer to take on order. They rush in where all others dare not tread, where the dangers are alternately obvious and not-so-obvious. Where others flee the scene of carnage and wreckage, they see it as their duty to be there, to scrutinize and evaluate, to safeguard and to humanize the intolerably inhumane scene of death and destruction.

West Fertilizer Co Epa
Firefighter conduct a search and rescue operation at an apartment destroyed by an explosion at a fertilizer plant in West, Texas, Thursday, April 18, 2013. A massive explosion at the plant killed as many as 15 people and injured more than 160, officials said overnight. (AP Photo/LM Otero)

And so it was in a small town in Texas, which had in its midst a fertilizer plant. Which had presented with safety and security problems in the past when its operations had been been checked by the Environmental Protection Agency. The U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration had fined West Fertilizer last summer for safety violations. The company was found in default of required safety procedures.

But West Fertilizer, in a risk-management plan that was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency, denied it was handling flammable materials. It had no sprinklers, water-deluge systems, blast walls, firewalls or safety mechanisms in place in the plant. And it assured the EPA and local authorities that the factory was never at any risk of explosion. This despite that it held 54,000 pounds of a gas that could explode at very high temperatures, if sparked.

A worst-case scenario, according to the officials operating the West Fertilizer Co. plant was that a short-lived gas release could occur that would never result in injuries to anyone. Presumably, those very same officials will now be offered the opportunity to explain just how they reached those conclusions, at subsequent enquiries, and in all probably in a court of law.

A explanation will be expected to make sense of the catastrophic explosion that took place at the plant on Wednesday night. Good thing it happened at night, when it might have been expected that no workers would be present. Dreadful thing that it happened at all, drawing people in the neighbourhood to observe at close range a fire out of control, before the explosion occurred. Before the explosion occurred, firefighters were on the scene.

The resulting concussion from the explosive might of the ignited fertilizer was enough to register on sensitive seismographic machinery as a small earthquake. The sound was heard for miles across the Texas prairie, demolishing almost everything for blocks around the plant, destroying the comfort and security of the town, while injuring over 200 people.

And fourteen people died. Most of them first-responders rushing to the scene to put out the initial fire. "Everyone knows the first-responders, because anytime there's anything going on, the fire department is right there, all volunteer", mourned one long-time resident of West. These first-responders were town residents, known personally to everyone.

"People's lives are devastated here. It's hard to imagine", said firefighter Darryl Hall, from a town about 80 kilometres away from West, who was one of the rescuers aiding with the house-to-house search looking for other possible victims. In the town of 2,700 people, 50 homes were destroyed. Three fire trucks and an ambulance were destroyed in the blast, along with a 50-unit apartment building, and damage done to the town's intermediate school.


The state, through its Texas Commission on Environmental Quality requires all facilities handling anhydrous ammonia, as West Fertilizer Co. did, to have sprinklers installed, along with other safety measures in recognition that the chemical is flammable. Inspectors failed to check whether the law was being respected in the plant, and the plant's officers felt no compulsion to obey laws that no one seemed anxious to enforce.

The town is picking up its pieces, and it is mourning its dead, those who felt compelled to respond when disaster struck their community, only to be struck down in the process.

Labels: , , , , ,

Saturday, April 20, 2013

Is the State Hiding a Major Bible Era Find?

Makor Rishon says authorities are keeping lid on what may be a royal castle from David's time.

By Gil Ronen -- Arutz Sheva 7
First Publish: 4/20/2013, 10:24 PM

The Jewish town of Tekoa in eastern Gush Etzion
The Jewish town of Tekoa in eastern Gush Etzion
Israel news photo: Flash 90
 
For unknown reasons, Israeli authorities are keeping lid on an archaeological find that may turn out to be a royal castle from David's time, reports Makor Rishon newspaper.

According to the paper, the site was identified by Binyamin Tropper, of the Kfar Etzion Field School. As he descended into a cave in the area of southern Jerusalem, he identified what professionals know as "a proto-aeolic capital" connected to a column.

The capital – which is the decorated stone at the head of an ancient column – dates back to the Biblical era, according to Field School Director Yaron Rosental. Only 30 such capitals have been found in Israel so far, and only five of them were found in areas in which Biblical-era kings lived.
Unlike all of the other proto-aeolic capitals found in Israel – this one is not separate from the column but connected to it.

"For reasons that are not completely clear," the newspaper writes, "several authorities in Israel have decided to silence the find, which may mark a breakthrough in the perception of the period of King David and his son, Shlomo [Solomon], and of the entire Judean kingdom.

The capital "apparently indicates that an entire temple of castle is buried beneath it," the newspaper adds. However, when Rosental contacted the Israel Antiquities Authority to inform them of the find, the person he spoke to simply said – "Yaron, good for you. You found it, but we already are aware of it. Now forget about the whole thing and keep your mouth shut."

Rosental said that he later found out that the IAA had known about the side for 18 months. He said that no digging has taken place since then, and that even steps like cordoning off the area to prevent damage to the rare find, have not been taken.

Rosental calls this "a scandal" but says that no less worrisome is that the state appears to have plans to move the separation fence between Israel and the PA in a way that will leave the site in the PA's hands,

According to Rosental, excavation of the site has potential for uncovering a complete castle from the Judean kings' period, for the first time ever. "We appear to have a complete castle here," he said. "Those who came after it did not know of its existence." The details found inside could be "amazing."

The IAA confirmed to Makor Rishon that the find is an important one that appears to date to the period of Judean kings. However, the IAA added, the subject is "sensitive" and "requires serious and responsible handing."

The IDF said that it offered the IAA "the full assistance needed" in order to remove the capital and column from the site.

More on this topic

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, April 18, 2013

Op-Ed: Close the Anne Frank Museum

Published: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 3:45 PM -- Arutz Sheva 7
The Anne Frank Museum is now a place rampant with anti-Semitism. Anne Frank has been sanitized and is now a human being, a girl, and only incidentally, a Jew. Holocaust against Jews?

Justin Bieber hopes Anne Frank “would have been a Belieber,” according to a message the teenage pop star wrote in the guestbook of the Amsterdam Museum dedicated to the late Jewish diarist.
And our hypocritical guardians of memory reprimanded the bad guy in unison.

Within the category of Nazi victims, no one is more in the foreground of world imagination than Anne Frank. She is nomen omen of the Holocaust. If people have read just one book about the Holocaust, it is "The Diary", which has been translated into sixty languages and published in more than 25,000,000 copies.

The Franks’ famous house on the Prinsengracht in Amsterdam, where the Frank family was hidden in a secret annex and where they were arrested in 1944, is the most frequently visited memory site in Europe (more than Auschwitz) and has had a major impact on how millions of people view Anne Frank.

But the Anne Frank Museum is also one of the reasons that Europe's conscience is so violently anti-Israel. According to Cynthia Ozick, Anne Frank's story has been “bowdlerized, distorted, transmuted, traduced, reduced, infantilized, Americanized, homogenized, sentimentalized, falsified, kitschified, and, in fact, blatantly and arrogantly denied".

The Anne Frank Museum is guilty not only because it sanitized Anne Frank’s story of almost all its Jewish references in order to project what it considered to be more important, the general theme of universal suffering and its transcendence through undying goodness and hope. Anne’s universalism has been intentionally emphasized by the Museum and Foundation in order to play down any threat of Jewish particularism.

The result is that the public is now completely desensitized to the unique catastrophe that was the destruction of European Jewry.

The Museum has also turned into a powerful source of criticism of Israel in Europe. I will give just a couple of examples.

In a recent report on xenophobia and racism written by the Anne Frank Foundation, it presented the Arabs’ conflict against Israel from a Palestinian Arab perspective: “There’s a balance between the random suicide attacks by the Palestinians and the fact that Israel isn’t worried about civilian casualties and collective punishment. Israel pushes Palestinians economically in a corner and humiliates them psychologically". This is what Anne Frank symbolized?

A photo of former MP Ariel Sharon alongside one of Adolf Hitler was exhibited at the Anne Frank Museum. The photos were presented as part of an exhibition on "borderline cases'" titled "Out of Line", aimed at testing the borders between freedom of expression and discrimination, according to the Museum's spokesman. Viewers were shown a video, in which demonstrators held a poster of Hitler and Sharon in protest over "Israel's policies in the Palestinian territories".

Natan Sharansky, then a minister in Sharon's cabinet, said it was further evidence of anti-Semitism in Europe. "When at the home of Anne Frank, one of the archetypal symbols of the tragedy of the Jewish people, Hitler, is compared to prime minister Ariel Sharon, it is not a debate on freedom of expression. It is showing contempt for the memory of the 6 million who were murdered in the Holocaust".

The Anne Frank Museum, like other similar Jewish institutions, first engaged in a process of dehistoricization (Anne was a human being, then a girl, and only incidentally a Jew), then in a kind of revisionist rehistoricization: the docile Jews, then criticism of the State of Israel and its stubborn citizens.

Last year the German EVZ Foundation financed two high school student programs which promoted hatred of Israel. In one program, Dutch Jewish anti-Israeli activist Hajo Meyer came to the Anne Frank High School in Gutersloh and equated Palestinian Arab suffering with Anne Frank and termed Israel a "criminal state." Then a Dutch public broadcasting network offered its viewers a board game featuring Israeli "settlers" who use “the Anne Frank card” to "colonize the West Bank".

Either close the Anne Frank Museum or change it back to what Anne Frank really signified. If not, one day we will wake up to discover that this radiant, gracious, innocent, untainted, defenceless and fun-loving Jewish girl was born not in Frankfurt, Germany, but in Nabi Saleh. And people will believe it.

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Health Delivery Initiatives

"The good news is that pharmacists can do it more conveniently and at a lower cost for patients and for the taxpayer. When Mom takes the baby to the ER for diaper rash, the baby gets great service, but it's terribly expensive for a rash that a pharmacist can treat very well."
Frank Scorpiniti, CEO, Rexall

The above beggars the imagination; a mother taking a baby to the local hospital's emergency room because of diaper rash? Please, have a little more respect for the intelligence of the young mothers of infants. Diaper rash is a common occurrence, and word-of-mouth between coevals, between mother and daughter, between sisters and friends, ensures that remedies are readily apparent and available.

Not to say it wouldn't have occurred to said mother to ask advice of her local pharmacist in any event. And in the event a really serious situation evolved respecting infection resulting from stubborn diaper rash, that's the time the mother could present to her general practitioner - or to the ER.

Other than the silly example given, and absent the obvious gains to be made by generic-drug pharmaceutical companies in Canada, the initiative by the country's pharmacists' organization in issuing a document titled 9,000 Points of Care, (the number representing the number of pharmacists practising in Canada), it seems like an idea whose time has come.

In point of fact, consumers of prescription drugs, patients for whom drug protocols have been prescribed by their physicians already do, in large part, take advice from dispensing pharmacists. Most druggists offer advice in areas where they are aware what the prescribed medication can do, along with side effects, and they also offer to print out broadsheets from computer-based pharmaceutical libraries to aid in further information availability.

Revisioning the added-value performance these professionals skilled in the dispensation of drugs represents an obvious idea waiting to be formalized by acceptance. Their knowledge is indispensable to their role in which people trust them to offer alerts that their doctors may have skipped or was not aware of, in the use of specific drugs. Pharmacists are known to give their useful advice with a view to being helpful.

The recommendation that allowing pharmacists to treat minor ailments, administer an array of vaccines and manage patients with chronic diseases, is a step in the right direction. It would, as promised, free up time for doctors already overworked, curb emergency room visits, and in the process provide cost-savings to the health care system.

Pharmacists' keen eye and memory often enough catch prescription errors, and they contact the prescribing doctor for clarification. They professionally vet what they are dispensing with an eye to being of service across the board, both to the doctors who prescribe medication and may have prescribed an inappropriate medication and the patients, in the case of someone already on a protocol, may have been prescribed an incorrect dosage.

Pharmacists undertake, on behalf of their customers, to make direct contact with the health professional concerned, to straighten out the matter, thus saving the patient from the potential of additional health problems relating to medication. What's in it for the generic drug manufacturers, who have partnered with the pharmacists in the initiatives set out in this white paper?

In Canada it can take months for provinces to list generic drugs on their drug-plan formulary, once they are approved by Health Canada. In the United States and likely other industrialized countries, that listing is immediate, once federal approval is given.  The instant listing of generics would be yet another useful update in the country's universal health care procedures.

Better use of generic drugs could save as much as $9-billion over a three-year period, according to the report. "In the U.S., the minute you have an approval, those cost savings are being felt in the health care system .. That's real money we're leaving on the table here in Canada", stated Jeff Watson, CEO of Apotex North America.

"For the most part, pharmacists are very well trained for everything we are suggesting. They have all the skills and they have the interest", says Dominic Pilla, CEO of Shoppers Drug Mart. To permit pharmacists to prescribe medication to people for acne, cold sores, rashes and hay fever is logical enough; most already do, with counter-top remedies.

Permitting pharmacists to administer flu shots as well as other vaccines, is already done in some of the provinces. And pharmacists are skilled and knowledgeable enough about chronic conditions like diabetes and hypertension to allow them to adjust dosages, renew prescriptions and speak with patients about their protocol management. Billing the related province for these services.

It's about time. About saving time, and it's about easy availability, and cost-savings.

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Reviling The Dead

Baroness Thatcher was careful to become involved in anything that mattered to her, from the politics of her country and her refusal to be thwarted, bullied, coerced or tempted by anything that disturbed her vision of the infallibility of her judgement, to the prospect of her death, and what she would wish to be remembered for, celebrated as, and above all, the ceremony that would accompany her funeral upon being dispatched from the living.

Queen Elizabeth II and her royal consort, who thought little of the woman when she was their Prime Minister, will both attend this signal event. A high-level committee executing what has been named Operation True Blue is hard at work putting the finishing touches on the funeral ceremony when Britain and her allies will send their final farewells to this woman both admired and despised.

She is seen at one and the same time as the Mother Theresa of the British economy and the Caligula of labour

The True Blue committee is comprised of MI5, National Security Secretariat, police, Buckingham Palace, Church of England, Parliamentary authorities, government departments, and representatives of Mrs. Thatcher's estate.  Her funeral will be a public and controversial one. There will be objectors, those who have amused themselves by celebrating her death, as a potent reminder of her legacy of scorn by British unions which she attempted to destroy.

LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM - APRIL 08: A lady drinks from a bottle and holds a front page of a newspaper displaying an image of former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher as she and others celebrate her death in Brixton on April 8, 2013 in London, England. Lady Thatcher has died this morning following a stroke aged 87. Margaret Thatcher was the first female British Prime Minster and governed the UK from 1979 to 1990. She led the UK through some turbulent years and contentious issues including the Falklands War, the miners' strike and the Poll Tax riots. (Photo by Danny E. Martindale/Getty Images)

The funeral will cost over $9-million, but would have cost more but for her request for it to stop short of a full state event, saving the taxpayer another $1.2-million. Dame Thatcher's estate is set to pay for part of the expenses, and the government doubtless the lion's share. But in fact, Britain celebrating itself in this manner is priceless, as it were. Poetry will be read, music played, paying homage to William Wordsworth and Sir Edgar Elgar.

The Guardian newspaper cartoon showed Mrs. Thatcher descending into hell, while the Socialist Worker front page printed "Rejoice". A movie marquee read: "Margaret Thatchers Dead LOL". So much for British dignity and heritage pride, giving no honour whatever to that controversial figure revered and detested. The public is taking no cue from their Queen for whom Mrs. Thatcher was not a beloved figure, but toward whom she is offering honour.

"This really shows the dissimilarity between the two countries", a dual national remarked, who had worked with Mrs. Thatcher after she left office, in academia. "One does not recall, with the passing of controversial figures in the U.S. anything remotely resembling the really crude approach we've seen over here. There is a class ingredient here that we simply don't have in America. They like to perpetuate this; the bitterness goes from father to son."

This is a public that had been through much, and their mean bitterness demonstrates just that; poverty, unemployment, misery. Britain's class system reduced to the establishment versus the unions during the economy-ameliorative reign of Mrs. Thatcher. The harm she did to those who were defenceless has outlived her. Her reputation as a fearless leader who would not back down from any of her positions remains highly admired by others who represent society and politics.

"Having lived in both places, I can see the U.K. is far more deprecating, far more critical, and has far fewer taboos in criticizing leaders. In a way, her death is allowing people to vocalize the sense of frustration they are feeling with the current economic crisis", pointed out Robin Niblett, director of the Chatham House think-tank.

Of course the United States has its notorious Fred Phelps and his Westboro Baptist Church to attend funerals of American servicemen and hold up obnoxious signs. Britain has its unionists who will picket Dame Thatcher's funeral carrying signs reading "Good Riddance".

Labels: , , ,

Sunday, March 24, 2013

The Guardian homeThe dwarves of Auschwitz

The story of a family of dwarves snatched from the gas chamber by Josef Mengele himself sounded incredible. But how to verify the testimony of Holocaust survivors? And should you even try?
The Ovitz family
The Ovitzs (from left): Elizabeth, Perla, Rozika, Frieda, Franziska and Avram
 
'I was saved by the grace of the devil," Holocaust survivor Perla Ovitz told us. Again and again, she recounted in detail how she and her family were taken to the gas chamber and ordered to strip naked. A heavy door opened and they were pushed inside. "It was almost dark and we stood in what looked like a large washing room, waiting for something to happen. We looked up to the ceiling to see why the water was not coming. Suddenly we smelled gas. We gasped heavily, some of us fainting on the floor. With our last breath we cried out. Minutes passed, or maybe just seconds, then we heard an angry voice from outside – 'Where is my dwarf family?' The door opened, and we saw Dr Mengele standing there. He ordered us to be carried out and had cold water poured on us to revive us."

The Ovitz family, from the village of Rozavlea in Transylvania, was the largest recorded family of dwarves: a dwarf father who sired 10 children, seven of them dwarves. Perla, born in 1921, was the youngest. In that remote part of Romania in the early 20th century, it was difficult for anyone to eke a living from the land and livestock, and impossible for someone standing less than 3ft tall.

Their mother, anxious for her children's future, guided them towards a common skill, a profession in which they could together make a living and would be neither isolated nor ostracised. As the five sisters and two brothers were all good-looking and musically gifted, the stage seemed the perfect choice: for where else could they be applauded, courted, honoured?

Throughout history, dwarves had been entertainers, often part of a circus or vaudeville show. But the Ovitzs wanted the stage all to themselves. They appropriately named their musical ensemble the Lilliput Troupe, and for 15 years had a flourishing career in central Europe. Their two-hour show consisted of popular hits of the day, skits and music. Perla had a tiny, four-string pink guitar that looked like a toy, her sisters Rozika and Franziska played on quarter-sized violins, Frieda struck on the cimbalom, Micki played both a half-sized cello and accordion, while the energetic Elizabeth took on the drums. Their elder brother Avram was the scriptwriter, actor and general manager.

The Ovitzs lived a communal life in one big house in the village. When any one of them got married, the spouse moved in and joined the enterprise. While the dwarves basked in the limelight, the average-height family members worked behind the curtains as stagehands and wardrobe mistresses. It was the only all-dwarf ensemble with a full show of their own in the history of entertainment.

When the Nazis came to power, the Ovitzs were doubly doomed: under the Aktion T-4 euthanasia programme, the Germans set out to kill people who were physically or mentally disabled, whose lives were considered "unworthy of living", "a burden on society"; and, as Jews, the Ovitzs were the target of the Final Solution.

On 19 May 1944, they were brought to the Auschwitz-Birkenau death camp because they were Jews. But, by a twist of fate, their disability played for them. It was rare that one person from an entire family survived the camp, let alone two, but all 12 members of the Ovitz family – the youngest a baby boy just 18 months old, the oldest his 58-year-old dwarf aunt – emerged alive.

Listening to the unimaginable horrors of Holocaust survivors, you shrink, stunned. But historians are reserved about oral testimonies. The witness may get the timeline wrong, forget facts or infuse memories of others into his or her own. Close to the event, the witness often finds it difficult to convey details of the trauma they endured. Crucial events can be forgotten, and trivial ones take centre stage. Consciously or unconsciously, shame and guilt can obliterate vital facts.
The Ovitzs leaving the camp in May 1944 The Ovitzs leaving Auschwitz-Birkenau in May 1944 
  We embarked on the trail of the seven dwarves of Auschwitz with the notion that we would subject their story to the same rigorous examination that would be applied to any other historical source. So we not only collected their testimonies, but crosschecked them with those of dozens of other survivors, inmates and doctors, either first-hand or in archives and libraries. We unearthed medical documents in Poland and Germany. Still, we followed the advice of Professor Yehuda Bauer, a Holocaust historian and himself a survivor, that "one must never argue with a survivor".

Descending the ramp at Auschwitz-Birkenau, the seven dwarves and their five average-height family members were immediately separated from the others in the transport. They were told to wait for the arrival of Mengele. In rotation with other physicians, he was sending the multitudes to their immediate death, and selecting the few fit enough for slave labour. He was also using his long shifts on the ramp to pluck out twins, as well as hunchbacks, hermaphrodites, giants, dwarves, obese men and corpulent women – in general, anyone suffering from a growth disorder.

On the night the Ovitzs arrived, Mengele was asleep in his room at the nearby SS headquarters. All the troopers on duty at the ramp, however, knew well of his passion, of his collector's mentality. To gain favour with the freak-hunter, they were always on the lookout for new specimens to enrich his "human circus". While a lone dwarf did not provide reason enough to knock on Mengele's door in the middle of the night, seven dwarves, along with their tall siblings, seemed good cause for disturbance.
While the SS were brutal towards the newly arrived, they were cheerful with the dwarves. Realising this, two families from the Ovitzs' village approached and told the officer they were related. The Ovitzs kept silent and did not prove them wrong. Now they were 22. Mengele hurried out to see his new acquisitions. He was delighted: "I now have work for 20 years," he exclaimed.

A black army truck took them to a building at the edge of the camp. They were pushed in, stripped naked and smelled the fumes. The event indelibly etched the imminence of death not only on Perla's memory; three other members of the group, whom we interviewed, as well as Elizabeth, Perla's sister, who wrote her memoir, all attested that they were beginning to be gassed and would have died if Mengele had not suddenly reappeared.

Though we had five first-hand eyewitness accounts, we wanted to verify the story. The only way to do so was to study the procedures and manuals of operating a gas chamber. These were designed to kill between 500 and 2,000 people at once, depending on the size of the hall. Cyclone B was effective only at a room temperature of 27C, which was achieved by cramping a mass of people together. Gas chambers were simply not operated for merely 22 people; small groups were shot.

Furthermore, according to the camp's rigid safety orders, SS personnel had to wear gas masks when operating Cyclone B. Although the victims died within 15 minutes, the SS men routinely waited half an hour before turning on the powerful fans that dispersed the gas from the chamber. Only then were the doors opened. The operators themselves did not enter; instead, Jewish inmates from the Sonderkommando were sent in to drag out the bodies for cremation. Once the extermination process had begun, it could not be halted, because by then it would have been impossible to open the doors.
What actually happened was that the Ovitzs and their neighbours were taken to the camp sauna for disinfection, where the water poured over heated stones produced much steam and fumes, as well as temperatures intense enough to cause someone to faint. The sauna had a particularly traumatic effect on both small children and fragile dwarves that might easily have created the impression of being gassed.

And what about the appearance of Mengele at the door? They regarded him as their saviour, and there were several later incidents in the camp when he indeed rescued them from imminent death at the hand of one of his rival doctors. So, for the Ovitzs, every narrow escape that they had in the camp was thanks to him.

Mengele had several hundred twins at his disposal, and he carried out notoriously cruel experiments on them that led to countless deaths. But he had only one family of dwarves, so he was careful not to put his precious guinea pigs at risk. He gave them special living quarters and their food portions were larger. Their hair was not shorn, because he needed it for his experiments. They were allowed to wear their own clothes, because prisoners' uniforms did not fit their bodies. Former inmates told us that they thought they were hallucinating when they saw a colonnade of seven dwarves dressed warmly and elegantly, as if for a Shabbat stroll.

In the research on twins, Mengele was the field worker for his mentor, Professor Otmar von Verschuer, in Berlin. But he was looking for a research niche of his own and he found it in dwarfism. Mengele was aiming not only to discover the biological and pathological causes of the birth of dwarves, but to demonstrate the racial theory that in the course of its long history, the Jewish race had degenerated into a people of dwarves and cripples.

Members of the Ovitz group described to us in detail the painful blood-taking that they underwent. Often they fainted and water was poured over them to revive them, only for siphoning their blood to resume. Medical science of the time was obsessed with blood and its constituents, and it was generally believed that plasma contained all genetic traits. But only the medical records, all bearing Mengele's flamboyant signature, clarified what he was looking for: signs of kidney problems, liver function, typhus and syphilis.

Written accounts of inmate doctors shed further light on the endless anthropological measurements and comparisons between the Ovitzs and their neighbours, whom Mengele mistook for family. The doctors extracted bone marrow, pulled out healthy teeth, plucked hair and eyelashes, and carried out psychological and gynaecological tests on them all.

The four married female dwarves were subjected to close gynaecological scrutiny. The teenage girls in the group were terrified by the next phase in the experiment: that Mengele would couple them with the dwarf men and turn their wombs into laboratories, to see what offspring would result. Mengele was known to have done it to other experimental subjects.

Inmates in Auschwitz-Birkenau tried to improve their lot with whatever talents they had. A barber would hope to shave a kapo (prisoner supervisor) for a piece of bread or two cigarettes; a seamstress might mend the block elder's clothing; a painter would get a piece of sausage for making portraits for the SS guards; and one champion chess player was kept alive to play with Mengele.

Professor Israel Gutman, an Auschwitz survivor and prominent historian, recalls that "feasts and saturnalias were celebrated at kapos' and block elders' quarters. The artistic programme consisted of obscenities and dirty jokes. Sometimes a prisoner with a sweet voice would sing prewar hits in various languages. The kapos especially favoured melancholy tunes. The famous stars were very popular among the kapos and enjoyed a special income, thanks to their art."

Perla and Elizabeth Ovitz Perla (right) and Elizabeth Ovitz: as the five sisters and two brothers were all good-looking and musically gifted, the stage seemed the perfect career 
  However, Perla Ovitz insisted that she and her family never took part in the "nightlife" of the death camp: they never performed in these drunken revelries, never sang in public nor entertained parties of kapos and SS men. She did remember one event. Sunday 30 July 1944 was the fast of Tishah Be'av, commemorating the destruction of the Holy Temple in Jerusalem. Being familiar with the Jewish calendar, Mengele perversely ordered the leader of the women's orchestra to prepare a special concert to desecrate the holy day. Perla remembered that the programme consisted of romantic, melancholy German songs that moved her and her sisters to tears as they watched the performance from their tiny stools in the audience.

Yet in her autobiography, Playing For Time, singer Fania Fénelon remembers it entirely differently: "We start with a foxtrot, Mengele waving his hand, the dwarves filling the stage, some couples dancing, other participants only managing a kind of grotesque, depressing twist. The men bow with a touch of servility; the women follow. Their jewellery, silk, ornaments glitter in the sun, igniting thousands of sparkles, dancing, swinging, intermingling. These creatures emit joyful sounds, trying to sing along with Clara, Lotte and me. They have high shrieking voices. The orchestra plays a march and they accompany with clapping and stamping."

Against the bleak backdrop of the death camp, the concert was so vivid that it became deeply etched in the memory of the survivors whom we interviewed. Isaac Taub was part of a group of twin boys enlisted to carry chairs and benches and arrange them in rows. The teenagers were allowed to stand at the back during the performance and Taub clearly remembered the Ovitzs on stage. "We all knew that the dwarves were performing for the Nazis."

Yet Perla denied that they ever took part. As pious, God-fearing Jews, the Ovitzs deemed performance in Auschwitz to be an abomination, like singing and dancing in a graveyard. Nor would performance under coercion have lessened their shame – not with a painful awareness that while they were entertaining Nazis, the chimneys never stopped smoking. No wonder they strove to erase their experience from their history, and their minds.

Death was the master of Auschwitz and its toll was piled outside for all to see, like so much garbage waiting to be collected. A space suddenly empty in a bunk did not shake heaven and Earth. Those who survived the night walked about as if wrapped in an invisible shell, praying to live one more day. But the Lilliput Troupe drew the inmates beyond their shells, to care about them and their whereabouts. Subsequently, many survivors referred to the fate of the dwarves in their own memoirs.

In her autobiography, Auschwitz: True Tales From A Grotesque Land, Sarah Nomberg-Przytyk describes in appalling detail the horrible death of two members of the Ovitz group, one of them an 18-month-old baby boy who died as a result of one of Mengele's experiments: "Around him, like pillars of stone, stood a large woman, along with the child's mother, slim and frail; the three midgets sat in miniature chairs." In the evening, the dead toddler was placed outside the block with the other corpses to be taken to the crematorium. Nomberg-Przytyk also recounts the death of Avram Ovitz, the leader of the group: "The old midget wanted his wife" and tried to slip through the barbed wire; a guard spotted him and, when Avram got close enough, shot him. "He never made it to his wife."

But the little boy and his uncle Avram were not killed, and lived to see liberation day. What, then, caused Nomberg-Przytyk to make such grave mistakes? Most likely she was compressing a number of events, and attributed to the dwarves two common occurrences in the daily life of the camp: the death of a child in his mother's arms and the shooting of an inmate who approached the electrified fence.

And there were others, such as Renee Firestone, who described the death of the Ovitz dwarves: "The Germans found a community of midgets, transported them to Auschwitz, shot them en masse and then were forced to let them sit in a pile for three days until the crematoria could take them."

One plausible explanation for the discrepancy between fact and remembrance is that the survivors, who regarded their own deliverance as miraculous, found the chances slim that someone as helpless as a dwarf could escape death. The fact that the Ovitzs were transferred several times from one side of the camp to the other caused their fellow inmates to lose touch with them, and in Auschwitz, when you stopped seeing someone, it could mean only one thing.

The seven dwarves, as well as their entourage, all survived the war, and emigrated to Israel in May 1949. Three months later, the Lilliput Troupe was back on stage. In 1955 they made their last bow, but dwarfism did not affect their life expectancy. The first-born, Rozika, reached the age of 98 and her sister Franziska died aged 91. Perla Ovitz died in September 2001.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Sunday, March 10, 2013

Imminent-Danger Oblivion

The Elliot Lake Algo Centre Mall enquiry under Commissioner Paul Belanger has resulted in some fascinating testimony from architects, engineers, inspectors and individuals who were, over the years, intimately involved in the technical plans and decision-making in the construction of the mall and its second-level parking garage. New techniques of waterproofing and new materials were being used.

Construction was taking place at a time of year when materials were being exposed to inimical conditions. The result was an engineering nightmare waiting to happen.
"The primary source of our problems was the choice of the hollow-core structural deck and the way it was constructed. There were too many slabs of hollow-core precast concrete loosely tied together and they moved more than we would have expected and in ways we didn't expect."
Dave Monroe, former vice-President, Harry S. Peterson Co., Michigan

Severe leaking at the mall was the nightmare that just wouldn't end. Inspectors warned of the dangers inherent in not addressing the problem. They also described a disabled system incapable of doing the job it was designed and installed to produce. And the danger they saw in not tackling the problem head on, as soon as possible. And then, having produced their reports, moved on, trusting that the urgency of the situation would be met with a solution.

Except it wasn't. The leaking from the parking deck into the stores below proved to be a problem beyond the experience of the construction company that had originally installed the system.  Remedial measures all carried some measure of hope that the problems would finally be resolved. There were many 'Eureka!' moments, but they were brief and transitory.

Construction of the mall was completed in 1980. The problem with leaks began almost immediately. A decade later an engineering inspector stated: "The design used for this roof slab is inappropriate in achieving a watertight condition." That's pretty unequivocal. It could be interpreted as a warning that to continue using the parking level as it was designed to be used, would be to be oblivious to the potential for disaster.

The solution seemed simple enough. No more heavy vehicles permitted to access the parking garage. No more light vehicles, No more vehicles, period, of any type, that would carry salt to corrode metal and concrete and cause water seepage and threaten the engineering and architectural integrity of the entire complex. But that evidently was too simple a solution. Parking had to be available somewhere, after all.

And it seemed not to have occurred to the mall owners - a succession of several different owners as it changed hands and responsibility, that a new parking area, on the ground adjacent the mall, be constructed, and the second level parking be completely abandoned, thus securing the integrity of the building. Other than dismantling it completely and starting all over again.

Use of the upper level garage continued. Inspections failed to flag the imminent danger of collapse. And on June 23, 2012 two women were killed and several other people injured when the rooftop garage finally collapsed into the mall supporting it below. The resulting rescue effort was an utter failure. And there was more than ample blame to go around.


A former Peterson employee, Henry Jasskelainen, testified.  He explained that the installation of the waterproofing began late because of project delays. Temperatures and moisture adversely affected vital curing of the sealant materials to bond to the concrete. "We were basically under the gun to put the system in. It seemed to always be wet here and we had an early winter. It created a very difficult environment."

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

The Russian president has insisted on a full slate of his traditional macho stunts this year, including scuba diving and possibly a trip to the way down under.

By , Correspondent / January 29, 2013
Russian President Vladimir Putin holds a meeting on economic issues in the Novo-Ogaryovo residence outside Moscow, Friday. The Russian president eyes a possible trip to Antarctica.
Mikhail Klimentyev/Presidential Press Service/RIA-Novosti/AP
President Putin, who's now over 60, has insisted on a full slate of his traditional macho stunts this year, including scuba diving, hockey playing, actions to protect endangered animal species, and a possible visit to a science station in Antarctica, Izvestia says.

"Vladimir Putin will continue his active hobbies. Maybe he will go scuba diving in the summer. He continues the fight to preserve endangered species," the paper quotes Putin's spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, as saying.

"As for a more 'patriarchal' style? Well, he has his own style, and that's his personal choice," he added.

Putin has been plagued with rumors of ill-health ever since he was seen limping at last September's APEC summit in Vladivostok. The Kremlin reacted indignantly to journalists' questions about his condition – which only seems to have inflamed the rumor-mill – and at some point Mr. Peskov conceded that the president was suffering from back pains.

Some pollsters argue that a recent dip in Putin's public approval rating, to about 62 percent from his usual 70 percent or so, might have been due to the uncertainties about his health.

"Putin's rating is down a bit, but it's a small fluctuation and doesn't spell a stable trend," says Alexei Grazhdankin, deputy director of the independent Levada Center in Moscow.

"These fluctuations occur for various reasons, and we attribute the latest dip to rumors about Putin's health. It's logical, because his image has always been based on his robust health and capacity for extreme actions.... I think he will repeat such actions because they confirm his own view that he controls his health much as he controls the country," Mr. Grazhdankin says.

Until recently, Putin had been regularly practicing at nights on a Moscow ice rink with Russian hockey pros – and occasionally with journalists – in preparation for what some Moscow sources whisper might be an exhibition game Putin was hoping to hold with other world leaders, including Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

Past stunts

Last September Putin took to the skies in a motorized hang glider to guide a group of endangered Siberian cranes onto their correct migratory flight path.

At other times he has shot a Siberian tiger with a tranquilizer gun, harpooned a grey whale with a crossbow, and tagged a captured polar bear on an Arctic ice flow (all in the interest of science).

According to Izvestia, Putin accepted an invitation from Chilean President Sebastian Pinera during a meeting in the Kremlin last September to visit Chilean and Russian science bases in Antarctica sometime early this year.

Peskov told the newspaper that the date has yet to be decided, "but since Putin is occupied with ecological issues, he will work with this question."

Some professional spin doctors argue that Putin would be wise to go with the flow of advancing age and cultivate a different, more realistic image for himself.

"A good PR specialist should not concoct beautiful lies, but find some merit in the client to focus on, tell people about, to show him in the best possible light," says Stanislav Radkevich, director of PR-3000, a Moscow think tank.

"In Putin's case, it should be connected with positive changes in the country that he has championed.... He needs to develop the image of a wise reformer, a competent leader, who is thinking about the fate of the country," he adds.

Elder image? Nyet.

But other experts argue that Putin will never accept the image of an aging, sedentary leader.
"At the beginning of his new term there was a lot of talk about how Putin might now be positioned [in the media], because of his age, as a wise man sitting in his study and handing down advice," says Leonid Polyakov, a political scientist with the Higher School of Economics in Moscow.

"Then Putin had a spinal trauma during a training session, and his spokesman confirmed that. His response to that appears to be that he is definitely not going to become the old man in the Kremlin....  I'm absolutely sure we're going to see more of Putin on horseback, jumping by parachute, taming tigers, and so on," he says.

"The explanation is simple. He just likes it. Sport is a way of life, Putin's still in good shape, and he simply can't stop."

Labels: , , ,

 
()() Follow @rheytah Tweet